Airport Security Machines: X-Ray Vision And Body Scanners Explained

Airport security machines are designed to protect passengers and prevent dangerous goods from entering aircraft. All passengers must walk through a metal detector, and their luggage is scanned with an X-ray machine. Full-body scanners, also known as millimetre wave scanners, use non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation to create an image of the body and detect objects without physically removing clothes or making physical contact. The waves that bounce off the body create an image that can reveal if someone is carrying something under their clothing. Backscatter X-ray scanners detect the radiation that reflects off the human body and can show hidden objects under clothing or luggage.

Full-body scanners

There are two main types of full-body scanners: millimeter wave scanners and backscatter X-ray scanners. Millimeter wave scanners use non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation in the extremely high-frequency radio band, generating images of the body and any hidden objects without using ionizing radiation. These scanners emit less energy than a cell phone and are considered safe, but long-term studies are lacking. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in the United States has implemented "Automated Target Recognition" software to replace nude body images with cartoon-like representations.

Backscatter X-ray scanners, on the other hand, detect radiation reflected from the human body and can identify objects hidden under clothing. These scanners have raised privacy concerns, and some airports have discontinued their use. Additionally, health concerns have been raised, particularly regarding X-ray scanners, and regulations have been put in place to limit radiation exposure.

Despite the benefits of full-body scanners, some limitations exist. Current scanners cannot adequately screen for security threats hidden under certain types of clothing, such as turbans, hijabs, burqas, casts, prosthetics, and loose clothing, requiring additional manual screening methods. However, manufacturers are working on the next generation of backscatter scanners to address this issue and equalize the screening process for religious minorities.

Privacy concerns

Airport security machines, including full-body scanners and facial recognition technology, have raised privacy concerns among travellers and experts. Many travellers view airport security scanning as an invasion of privacy, as both body and luggage scanners can reveal more information than passengers are comfortable with.

Full-body scanners use waves to create an image of the body and detect objects hidden under clothing. There are two main types: millimeter-wave scanners, which use high-frequency radio waves, and backscatter X-ray scanners, which detect radiation reflecting from the body. While these scanners are designed to enhance security by detecting non-metal objects, they have faced criticism for potentially violating passengers' privacy. In response to concerns, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) stated in 2010 that the machines do not store images of passengers. However, it was later disclosed that the scanners have image storage and transmission capabilities, although these features are disabled in operational settings.

Facial recognition technology at airports has also sparked privacy concerns. This technology, driven primarily by immigration policy and efficiency, has been criticised for normalising the treatment of facial data as a commodity that can be stored, tracked, and potentially stolen. While proponents argue that facial recognition enhances security and expedites boarding processes, critics highlight the lack of proven effectiveness in improving security and the potential for misuse or data breaches.

As airport data management and technology continue to evolve, ensuring the protection of personal data becomes increasingly crucial. This includes addressing cybersecurity risks, such as phishing attacks, malware, and data breaches, which can compromise sensitive information and disrupt airport operations. To maintain trust and confidence in the aviation industry, it is essential to balance the implementation of advanced technology with robust privacy protections and transparency in data handling practices.

X-ray scanners

In terms of privacy, X-ray scanners do not store images of passengers. The machines are lined with lead to prevent radiation from escaping, and the radiation dose is equivalent to the cosmic background radiation one would be exposed to during an hour's flight at ten kilometres' altitude.

Metal detectors

The use of metal detectors and other screening equipment has raised concerns about privacy and health risks. Regarding privacy, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has stated that they do not store images of passengers at airports. However, there have been instances where images have been recorded and disseminated, raising concerns about the potential for invasion of privacy.

Health concerns relate primarily to the use of X-ray scanners and the potential exposure to radiation. While the radiation doses from security scanners are considered safe, there are ongoing studies to assess the potential health risks, especially for frequent travellers.

Health concerns

There are several health concerns associated with airport security machines. Firstly, the use of ionizing radiation in some security devices has raised concerns about potential health risks. While these machines emit low levels of radiation, there is still a risk of exposure to both travellers and workers. Ionizing radiation has sufficient energy to knock electrons out of atoms, a process known as ionization. This type of radiation is used in backscatter X-ray machines and cabinet X-ray machines to scan luggage and identify hidden objects.

To address these concerns, safety measures have been implemented to minimize exposure to ionizing radiation. Additionally, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has the authority to set standards and regulations for machines that produce radiation, including airport security systems. The FDA requires that all machines be correctly calibrated and maintained to ensure safe operation.

Another health concern relates to the use of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in metal detectors. While most hand-held and walk-through metal detectors do not use X-rays, they operate using EMF technology to detect the presence of metal on or in the body. The World Health Organization (WHO) has conducted research on the effects of EMFs on general health. They concluded that current evidence does not confirm any health consequences from exposure to low-level electromagnetic fields. However, they also acknowledged gaps in knowledge that require further research.

Additionally, there have been concerns about the safety of full-body scanners used in airport security. Between 2009 and 2013, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employed Rapiscan backscatter machines, which produced low-energy X-rays. This led to worries about increased radiation exposure for individuals passing through these scanners. As a result of these concerns, pilot and flight-crew unions successfully lobbied for changes, and the TSA replaced these machines with safer alternatives.

Furthermore, the act of flying itself exposes individuals to higher levels of cosmic radiation and EMFs. The magnetic fields created by the jet engine, on-board electronics, communications, and static electricity in the fuselage can contribute to increased exposure. However, it is important to note that airport security systems have undergone significant improvements to address health concerns while maintaining high-security standards.

Frequently asked questions