Australia's Airports: Privatization And The Future Of Aviation

Australia's airport privatisation model has sparked debate, with airlines criticising light regulation and high fees, while airports boast high margins and infrastructure improvements. This discussion comes two decades after airports in major cities were sold to private investors, shifting profits from airlines to airport operators. The Australian government has received billions from airport sales, maximising proceeds, but concerns arise over monopoly power and price gouging, particularly in parking fees. Internationally, Australia's model influences other countries considering airport privatisation, highlighting the need for effective regulation.

Airports sold to pension funds and infrastructure investors

Australia has been privatising its airports since the 1990s. The Federal Airports Corporation (FAC), formed in 1988, was a corporatised entity that administered Australia's major airports. By 1994, the government's policy shifted in favour of privatisation.

The government has sold 17 of the FAC's 22 airports, receiving US$2.6 billion (1998/99 values). The airports sold include those in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Perth, which were sold to pension funds and infrastructure investors.

In September 2024, The Infrastructure Fund (TIF), State Super, and Australian Retirement Trust (ART) announced the sale of their combined 74.25% interest in Queensland Airports Limited (QAL) to a consortium comprising global investment firm KKR and the Skip Essential Infrastructure Fund. QAL comprises Gold Coast, Townsville, Mount Isa, and Longreach airports, servicing travellers across more than 40 domestic and international routes.

The sale of QAL is an example of private capital supporting airports in meeting growing capacity needs and traveller expectations by investing in upgraded and expanded infrastructure. This is a common trend in Australia, with airports in its major cities being privatised.

The privatisation of airports in Australia has resulted in some of the highest margins in the world for airport operators. However, it has also led to concerns about the increase in airport charges and the lack of regulation by the government.

The Federal Airports Corporation (FAC)

The FAC improved the performance of the airports sector and broadened the revenue base through commercial and property development. By 1994, however, policy thinking shifted in favour of privatisation. The Keating government announced that all airports operated by the FAC would be privatised in several phases. Melbourne Airport, for example, was to be included in the first phase.

A firm decision was made in 1996 by the Howard government that each airport would be leased to an individual operator for 50 years, with an option for a 49-year extension. Airport divestment was initiated in 1997 with the leasing of Melbourne, Brisbane, and Perth Airports, followed by Adelaide, Canberra, and Gold Coast airports.

By 30 June 1998, all significant assets and liabilities of the FAC were transferred to the new airport lessee companies. The FAC continued airport operations until 24 September 1998, and the transfer of residual assets and liabilities to the Federal Government was completed on 8 September 1999.

So far, the Australian government has sold 17 of the FAC's 22 airports and received US$2.6 billion (1998/99 values). Price-capping arrangements have been put in place for the major airports, and legislation has been introduced to ensure competitive access.

Airport divestment

The Australian government has played a significant role in the divestment process by creating a regulatory framework that encourages private investment in airports. This involves establishing clear guidelines and criteria that must be met for the successful privatisation of airport assets. One of the key factors is ensuring that the airport remains operational and maintains a certain level of service quality after privatisation. To achieve this, the government may impose specific key performance indicators (KPIs) and service standards that the new airport owner must adhere to. These KPIs could relate to areas such as safety, security, efficiency of operations, and environmental management.

The government typically retains a level of oversight and monitoring to ensure that the privatised airport continues to serve the interests of users and the wider community. This can involve regular reporting requirements, performance assessments, and even penalties for non-compliance with the agreed-upon standards. Another critical aspect of airport divestment is the consideration of competition and market power. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) plays a vital role in assessing the potential impact of airport privatisation on competition in the aviation market. The ACCC evaluates whether the privatisation could lead to a substantial lessening of competition, especially regarding airport charges and the quality of services provided.

To address competition concerns, the government may implement access regimes, such as the Declaration of Airport Services, which requires certain airports to provide third-party access to their services and facilities. This ensures that even after privatisation, other industry participants, such as airlines, are not unfairly hindered from accessing essential airport services. The divestment process also involves a comprehensive valuation and due diligence phase. The government, in consultation with independent advisors and experts, determines the fair market value of the airport asset. This involves assessing the airport's financial performance, infrastructure, and future growth prospects. Due diligence is then conducted by potential bidders, who thoroughly examine the airport's operations, legal standing, and any potential risks or liabilities associated with the asset.

Finally, the actual privatisation process can take several forms, including public float, trade sale, or a long-term lease. The public float involves listing the airport on the stock exchange, allowing public investors to purchase shares in the airport entity. A trade sale involves a direct sale of the airport asset to a private company or consortium. In the case of a long-term lease, the government retains ownership of the asset but grants a long-term lease, typically for 30 to 99 years, to a private operator, who then runs and develops the airport under the terms of the lease agreement. Each of these methods has its own advantages and considerations, and the chosen approach depends on the specific circumstances and goals of the divestment process.

Regulatory framework

The privatisation of airports in Australia has been a gradual process, with the Federal Airports Corporation (FAC) overseeing the operation of major passenger airports since 1988. The FAC improved airport performance and broadened revenue streams through commercial and property development. However, by 1994, the government's policy shifted towards privatisation, aiming to maximise proceeds from sales while addressing concerns about airports' monopoly power.

The regulatory framework for airport privatisation in Australia is complex and has evolved over time. Initially, the Prices Surveillance Authority (PSA) monitored the charges imposed by the FAC, advocating for price-capping, which the government adopted. These price caps were implemented for a five-year period, after which a major review would decide on future directions.

To ensure competitive access, the Australian government introduced legislation and established a regulatory system for post-privatisation management. The government has sold 17 of the FAC's 22 airports, receiving US$2.6 billion (1998/99 values). The privatisation process involved multiple phases, with Melbourne, Brisbane, and Perth Airports being among the first to be leased to private operators for 50 years, with an option for a 49-year extension.

The Australian Competition Regulator has highlighted concerns about airport charges, with take-off and landing fees rising by 26% in real terms over the last decade. This has impacted airline operating costs and ticket prices, shifting profits from airlines to airport operators.

Additionally, there are ongoing debates about the siting of a second major airport in the Sydney region, where four of the remaining airports are located. The Australian government's Airports Act 1996 exempts airport land from state and municipal planning systems, impacting adjacent areas' social and economic activities.

The privatisation of Australian airports has led to significant infrastructure improvements, with private funding contributing to enhanced capacity, services, and facilities. However, there are conflicting views on the impact of privatisation, with airlines advocating for new rules to lower their costs and address disputes over fees.

Local impact

The privatisation of airports in Australia has had a varied impact on local communities. On the one hand, privatisation has resulted in improved services and infrastructure, with private companies investing in cutting-edge technology and amenities to enhance the customer experience. This has led to increased competition among airports, which can benefit passengers through improved travel experiences and customised solutions that cater to local needs.

However, one of the main criticisms of airport privatisation in Australia is the potential negative impact on local communities and passengers. Private operators, driven by profit, may prioritise financial gains over community interests, leading to reduced transparency and accountability in decision-making processes. Higher charges and fees, such as landing and passenger service fees, can result in increased ticket prices and additional charges for services within the airport, making travel more expensive for passengers.

Furthermore, privatisation can lead to workforce restructuring, causing job insecurity and labour disputes within the local community. The shift from public to private ownership can also result in reduced public engagement and influence in local communities, as local and state planning authorities are excluded from development approval processes, which remain solely with the Commonwealth Government.

The impact of privatisation on airport productivity and efficiency is debated. Some studies show significant total factor productivity increases in Australian airports post-privatisation, while others suggest privatisation was negatively associated with profitability and had no significant impact on efficiency.

Overall, the local impact of airport privatisation in Australia has been mixed, with benefits such as improved services and competition balanced against concerns over increased costs, reduced transparency, and negative effects on local employment.

Frequently asked questions