Indianapolis Airport Smoking Areas: Where To Light Up?

As of July 1, 2008, Indianapolis International Airport (IND) is a non-smoking airport. A new ordinance was enforced, banning smoking on all airport property. Previously, there was a designated smoking area outside the terminal, but this was removed, and now smokers have to leave the airport grounds to smoke.

Indianapolis International Airport has been smoke-free since 2016

The decision to implement this ban was made with the health of the general public and employees in mind. According to the airport spokesman, Mike Medvescek, the ban would apply to "any airport property owned by the Airport Authority." This was further emphasised by Winfred Weah, a non-smoker, who stated that individual liberties should not infringe on someone else's health.

Prior to the ban, Indianapolis International Airport did have designated smoking areas. However, as of 2016, the airport authorities decided to remove these areas and implement a complete smoking ban. This decision was met with mixed reactions from the public, with some smokers expressing their discontent and feeling that their rights were being infringed upon, especially if they were isolated from others.

Despite the mixed reactions, the Indianapolis International Airport's smoking ban was a significant step towards prioritising public health and creating a more comfortable environment for all travellers and employees. It is important to note that this ban only applies to smoking cigarettes and does not include other forms of smoking, such as vaping.

All smoking areas have been removed from the airport

As of July 1, 2008, Indianapolis International Airport (IND) is a 100% smoke-free airport. All smoking areas have been removed from the airport premises, and no one is allowed to smoke anywhere on the airport property. This includes any areas owned by the Airport Authority, such as just outside the terminal.

The implementation of this smoking ban was first announced on April 15, 2016, and it was met with mixed reactions. Some non-smokers supported the decision, citing the importance of public health and the potential infringement of smoking on the health of others. On the other hand, some smokers and non-smokers alike believed that designated smoking areas should still be provided, arguing that it was an individual liberty to smoke, especially in isolated areas away from non-smokers.

The Indianapolis International Airport, located off I-70 via exit 68, just five minutes west of I-465, is now one of the first airports in the United States to implement such a comprehensive smoking ban. This decision aligns with the airport's priority for the health and well-being of its passengers and employees.

It is worth noting that this ban applies to all types of smoking substances and devices, including cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and vaping devices. The airport's management team has communicated that their intention is not to penalize smokers but to create a healthier environment for all individuals passing through the airport.

The smoking ban was the first of its kind in the US

Indianapolis International Airport (IND) was once home to a designated smoking area just outside its terminal. However, in 2016, the airport implemented a new ordinance that made all properties owned by the Airport Authority smoke-free. This move was unprecedented among US airports, marking the first smoking ban of its kind in the country.

Prior to the ban, smokers could indulge in their habit in a designated area outside the terminal. But with the new ordinance, that area was removed, and smoking was prohibited across all airport properties. The decision was driven by a priority shift towards the health of the general public and employees, as highlighted by airport spokesman Mike Medvescek.

The American Nonsmokers Rights Foundation celebrated the move, acknowledging its uniqueness in the United States at the time. Bob Duncan, the airport director, reflected on the behavioural change the ordinance would bring about, understanding that while it might not change lives, it would certainly alter behavioural patterns.

The smoking ban at Indianapolis International Airport sparked mixed reactions. Some non-smokers supported the decision, citing the infringement of smoking on others' health. However, smokers pushed back, arguing for their right to smoke outside, particularly when isolated from others. The enforcement of the ordinance by public safety officers at the airport was also questioned, with some smokers resistant to the idea of changing their behaviour.

The Indianapolis International Airport's smoking ban set a precedent for other airports in the United States, with many airports now embracing 100% smoke-free policies, both indoors and outdoors. This shift aligns with the increasing priority given to the health of employees and travellers, moving away from prioritising tobacco industry profits.

The ban was implemented to protect the health of the general public and employees

Indianapolis International Airport is a smoke-free airport. On April 15, 2016, a new ordinance was implemented, banning smoking in any area of the airport property owned by the Airport Authority. This includes a designated smoking area just outside the terminal, which was also taken down.

Prior to the ban, Indianapolis International Airport did have designated smoking areas within the airport premises. However, with the new ordinance, the airport joined a growing number of airports in the United States that have implemented similar smoke-free policies. According to the American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation, the ban was the first of its kind in the country.

While some smokers may argue that it is their right to smoke in designated outdoor areas, the health of non-smokers should also be considered. Secondhand smoke contains over 7,000 chemicals, including hundreds that are toxic and about 70 that can cause cancer. By eliminating smoking areas, the airport is reducing the exposure of non-smokers to these harmful substances.

The implementation of the smoking ban at Indianapolis International Airport is a positive step towards protecting public health. By prioritizing the well-being of individuals, the airport is creating a safer and healthier environment for travelers and employees alike. This decision sets a precedent for other airports and public spaces to follow suit, ultimately improving the air quality and health of communities across the country.

Some people disagree with the ban, arguing that designated smoking areas should exist

Indianapolis International Airport has been smoke-free since 2008, with no designated smoking areas on the property. However, some people disagree with the ban, arguing that designated smoking areas should exist.

One argument is that smokers should have the right to smoke in designated areas, especially if they are isolated from non-smokers. This is a matter of individual liberties and freedom of choice. Some non-smokers also support this idea, believing that smokers should not be penalized for their habit, just as non-smokers are not penalized for drinking coffee.

Another viewpoint is that a total smoking ban infringes on smokers' individual liberties, especially for those working long hours at the airport. They argue that smoking should be allowed in designated areas as long as it does not infringe on the health of others. This perspective highlights the challenge of balancing public health and individual freedoms.

Some smokers express their willingness to respect non-smokers' preferences by smoking in isolated areas, away from non-smokers. They believe that the potential impact on others, such as the smell of smoke, is minimal in open-air environments. Additionally, smokers may feel that the presence of exhaust fumes from buses and automobiles is a more pressing health concern that should be prioritized.

While Indianapolis International Airport has removed all smoking areas, the existence of varying opinions highlights the ongoing debate surrounding smoking bans in public spaces. Designated smoking areas in airports continue to be a topic of discussion, with some advocating for the rights of smokers while also considering the health and comfort of all individuals in shared spaces.

Frequently asked questions