Brisbane Airport: Curfew-Free Travel Hub?

Brisbane Airport is one of Australia's fastest-growing airports and has been the subject of debate regarding the need for a night curfew. A curfew would restrict aircraft movements during certain hours, usually late at night and early in the morning, to mitigate noise impacts on nearby residents. While some airports impose curfews to protect residents from aircraft noise, Brisbane Airport has not implemented one as it prioritizes maximizing capacity and maintaining its competitive advantage as a 24-hour airport. The absence of a curfew is also aligned with the airport's commitment to minimizing the impacts of aircraft noise on the surrounding community through collaboration with relevant organizations and partners.

Brisbane Airport has no curfew

Brisbane Airport is the third busiest airport in the country and its capacity needs to be improved as it handles growing air traffic numbers. An additional runway is still some time away from being operational, and in the meantime, all efforts should be made to maximise capacity.

The nearest house is more than six kilometres from the runway, which is double the buffer at Melbourne Airport, where there is no curfew. Aircraft using Brisbane Airport should take advantage of its coastal position by flying over water as much as possible.

The absence of a curfew gives Brisbane a competitive advantage. It allows for flexibility in flight scheduling and enables the airport to accommodate international visitors who may arrive at any time of the day or night.

Brisbane Airport recognises the impact of aircraft noise on nearby residents and is committed to working with Airservices Australia, airlines, and the community to minimise these impacts. Reducing noise disturbance is a priority, and the airport continues to work towards delivering sustainable aviation with less impact on the surrounding community.

The federal government will not impose a curfew

The absence of a curfew at Brisbane Airport is advantageous for the local economy and tourism industry. By allowing 24-hour operations, Brisbane gains a competitive edge over other airports with curfews. This flexibility enables the airport to accommodate flights at any time, particularly international arrivals, thereby attracting more visitors to the region.

Additionally, the nearest house is situated more than six kilometers from the runway, which is double the buffer at Melbourne Airport, where a curfew is in place. This distance significantly reduces the impact of aircraft noise on nearby residents. Brisbane Airport's coastal position also plays a role in noise mitigation, as planes can take advantage of flying over water whenever possible, minimizing disturbances over populated areas.

Brisbane Airport recognizes the importance of addressing aircraft noise concerns. They are committed to working with Airservices Australia, airlines, and the community to minimize the impact of aircraft noise on residents. This commitment includes ongoing efforts to improve flight path planning and maximize runway capacity to ensure sustainable aviation with less disruption to the community.

While the federal government's decision to not impose a curfew is primarily driven by economic and tourism considerations, it also acknowledges the importance of noise mitigation. By maximizing the airport's capacity and implementing strategic flight paths, Brisbane Airport strives to balance the needs of the aviation industry with the well-being of the surrounding community.

In summary, the federal government's decision to not impose a curfew on Brisbane Airport is a strategic choice that considers economic growth, tourism competitiveness, and noise mitigation. By allowing unrestricted flight operations, Brisbane Airport gains a competitive advantage while also managing noise impacts through careful planning and community engagement.

The impact of a curfew on the economy and tourism

Brisbane Airport does not have a curfew. A curfew would have impacted the local economy and tourism industry, according to Infrastructure Minister Warren Truss.

Airports play a significant role in the economic shaping of the communities they serve. They are among the largest public facilities in the world and are fundamental to the economy of any region. They provide access to various worldwide markets, leading to trade and commerce, which in turn lead to jobs, earnings, and overall economic benefits for a community's residents.

However, there are also negative economic impacts associated with airports, particularly international airports. The United Nations Environment Programme on Resource Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption and Production states that there are many hidden costs to tourism, which can have unfavorable economic effects on the host community. Economic leakage, for example, occurs when tourist spending goes to airlines, hotels, and international companies that are usually foreign, resulting in most of the spending not circulating to local businesses and workers. Additionally, infrastructure costs, inflation, and environmental impacts can also be considered as negative consequences of airports.

Aircraft noise and its mitigation

Aircraft noise is one of the most detrimental environmental effects of aviation. It can cause community annoyance, disrupt sleep, negatively impact children's learning, and even increase the risk of cardiovascular disease for people living near airports. As air traffic continues to grow, it is crucial to address aircraft noise and implement effective mitigation strategies.

Brisbane Airport and Its Curfew

Brisbane Airport, the third busiest in Australia, does not have a curfew, unlike some other airports in the country. The federal government's decision to not impose a curfew was based on economic considerations and the belief that it would have a minimal impact on mitigating aircraft noise. However, the airport takes noise mitigation seriously and is committed to finding new ways to manage noise impacts.

Aircraft Noise Mitigation Strategies

• Source reduction: This involves reducing noise at the source, such as improving aircraft engine and aerodynamic design. For example, larger fan blades that turn at slower speeds can reduce both noise and fuel consumption.
• Restrict flight paths: By optimizing flight procedures and modifying operating runways, the number of people exposed to aircraft noise can be reduced. This approach is particularly effective for densely populated areas near airports.
• Implement curfews: While controversial, curfews during specific times can provide respite from aircraft noise for nearby residents.
• Land use planning: Proper land use planning can minimize the impact of aircraft noise on surrounding communities. This includes designating noise-sensitive areas, such as schools and hospitals, and implementing noise reduction measures for existing and new buildings.
• Sound insulation: Installing sound insulation in homes and schools near airports can effectively reduce indoor noise levels and protect residents' health and well-being.
• Noise mapping: Creating noise maps can help identify areas with high noise levels and guide the implementation of noise insulation and other mitigation measures.
• Aircraft type optimization: Replacing older, noisier aircraft with newer, quieter models can significantly reduce noise levels, especially in areas exposed to high noise.
• Regulate night flights: Reducing the number of night flights or implementing a curfew can substantially decrease the overall noise-exposed area and population.

Aircraft noise is a complex issue that requires a combination of strategies to effectively mitigate its impact on communities. While some strategies focus on reducing noise at the source, others aim to minimize its effects on people and the environment. By implementing a range of mitigation measures, airports can improve the acoustic environment for nearby residents while balancing economic and operational considerations.

The Brisbane Airport Corporation's stance on noise complaints

The Brisbane Airport Corporation (BAC) recognises that while the benefits of the airport's operations are felt across the city, state, and country, the burdens of aircraft noise are carried by those who live nearby. The BAC is committed to working with Airservices Australia, airlines, and the community to minimise the impact of aircraft noise on residents.

In 2009, the BAC CEO, Julieanne Alroe, stated that reducing noise disturbance was a high priority and that the BAC would continue to work with Airservices Australia and airline partners to deliver sustainable aviation with less impact on the community. She emphasised that the BAC took noise mitigation very seriously and would continue to lead the country in finding new ways to manage noise impacts.

Alroe also acknowledged that the number of noise complaints may not always be an accurate guide to the issue's severity. Instead, she suggested that better flight path planning and improved use of runways could help mitigate noise concerns. She made a personal pledge to Federal Infrastructure Minister Anthony Albanese to lead this process and believed that there was much room for improvement before considering anything as "extreme" as a curfew.

The BAC's stance on noise complaints aligns with the views of the Queensland Premier, Anna Bligh, who ruled out the need for a night curfew at Brisbane Airport in 2009. Bligh emphasised the economic advantages of the airport's 24-hour operations, particularly regarding international visitors. Similarly, the Brisbane Lord Mayor, Campbell Newman, supported the absence of a curfew, citing the airport's positive economic impact on the city.

While there have been ongoing debates about the need for a curfew at Brisbane Airport, the BAC remains focused on actively engaging with stakeholders to address noise concerns and minimise disturbances to nearby residents.

Frequently asked questions