Handcuffs On Children: Airport Security Or Child Abuse?

The use of handcuffs on children is a highly controversial topic. While some argue that handcuffs should only be used on children as a last resort to prevent them from harming themselves or others, others believe that handcuffing children is a violation of their human rights. In the United States, for example, Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) has been known to handcuff and detain children, particularly those who are immigrants or refugees, with little regard for their basic rights. Additionally, in New York City, schools have been criticized for handcuffing and removing children in mental crisis, even as young as 5 years old. This has sparked debates about the appropriate use of restraints on children and the need for better training and resources to handle such situations.

Handcuffing children in US schools

There have been several documented incidents of children being handcuffed in US schools, often involving students with disabilities or special needs. In one case in Texas, a 10-year-old girl with autism and learning disabilities was handcuffed by police after being physically aggressive and throwing markers in class. The incident raised questions about whether the use of handcuffs was justified, as the girl's father argued that she was not posing an immediate threat to anyone. This incident led to the passage of the "No Kids in Cuffs" law in Texas, which prohibits restraining students in fifth grade or below unless they pose a serious risk of harm.

Another incident in Kentucky involved two mentally disabled children who were handcuffed for misbehaving in class. The mothers of the children filed a lawsuit alleging that the officer used excessive force and caused pain, fear, and emotional trauma. The lawsuit also cited a government report that documented hundreds of incidents of police restraining children in schools across the country, with a disproportionate number of those involving children with disabilities.

The practice of handcuffing children in schools has been met with strong opposition from parents, community members, and advocates. Some argue that it sends the wrong message to students and can lead to a cycle of future violence and criminality. There are also concerns about the impact of handcuffing on children's mental health and well-being, with research suggesting that it can breed distrust of authority figures and encourage the use of force to settle disputes.

In response to these incidents and concerns, some school districts have banned the use of handcuffs as a form of discipline. For example, Jackson Public Schools in Mississippi was forced to change its policy of handcuffing students to stationary objects after a lawsuit was filed. The U.S. District Judge ordered the district to stop handcuffing students younger than 13 years of age and prohibited the shackling of older students for minor infractions.

The issue of handcuffing children in US schools remains a complex and contentious topic, balancing the need for discipline and safety in schools with the potential harm and trauma caused by the use of handcuffs on young people.

Handcuffs as allowed carry-on items

While it is not illegal for civilians to possess or carry handcuffs, doing so may be unwise for several reasons. Firstly, it may be perceived as impersonating a police officer, which is illegal. Secondly, without proper training, there is a risk of hurting the person being handcuffed, leading to potential legal consequences. Carrying handcuffs may also be impractical for self-defence, as attackers could take them away and use them against you.

In the context of air travel, there is no explicit prohibition on carrying handcuffs as a permitted carry-on item. The final decision rests with the TSA officer at the checkpoint. However, given the potential concerns outlined above, it is generally not advisable to carry handcuffs as a means of self-protection.

In the United States, there have been disturbing reports of children being handcuffed and interrogated at airports, particularly those from immigrant families. These incidents highlight the disproportionate use of force and the lack of regard for basic human rights in such situations. It is important to be aware of your rights and carry essential documents, such as children's birth certificates, when travelling to ensure your safety and well-being.

Handcuffing children in US immigration detention

Handcuffing children is a practice that has been documented in US immigration detention centres. While there is limited media coverage of immigrant youth detention centres, reports have surfaced of children being handcuffed and treated like common criminals during transit. This includes a story of a five-year-old boy who was interrogated for hours at an airport while handcuffed.

The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency is responsible for detaining undocumented youth, including those who attempt to cross the border illegally or are in the juvenile justice system without a clear legal status. Once in ICE custody, youth are sent to detention centres, jails, or ICE-contracted facilities, which are designed for incarcerated individuals convicted of committing crimes. This means that undocumented youth, who are often detained solely because of their legal status, are being sent to criminal settings and treated like criminals.

The treatment of these youth has been described as "disgraceful", with limited access to basic necessities and services. They are denied access to education, healthcare, legal services, and other fundamental rights. Furthermore, they are often detained for prolonged periods, with limited knowledge of how long they will be incarcerated. This has been shown to cause physical and mental harm, with inadequate medical care and inappropriate screening and follow-up care.

The lack of regulation and accountability within ICE has been highlighted by attorneys and lawsuits, who warn that basic human rights are being compromised for profit. The Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which provides protections for unaccompanied children, ends once these children turn 18, and they are then handcuffed and taken to detention centres. This practice of handcuffing children, especially on their birthdays, has been noted as a mystery of the US immigration system.

Handcuffing children in mental health crisis

While I could not find specific information about handcuffing children in airports, I did find some general information on handcuffing children, particularly those in a mental health crisis.

The unnecessary and unregulated physical restraining of children is a shocking practice that must be addressed. While there are occasions where such measures are necessary, for example, where there is a considerable risk of the child harming themselves, the use of handcuffs on vulnerable children is often unacceptable and can leave mental scars that take years to heal. Children have reported feelings of PTSD, helplessness, and confusion, as well as increasing distrust and hostility towards authority figures. The practice of handcuffing children can also create a vicious cycle where children become too terrified to travel to important therapy appointments, further declining their mental health.

In the United States, Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) has been criticized for detaining and interrogating children, including a 5-year-old boy who was handcuffed for hours at an airport. While the White House defended the action, attorneys warn that people who were not born on US soil should be cautious about traveling overseas.

In addition, a study in Alameda County found that police were more likely to handcuff Black children, particularly girls, experiencing a mental health crisis. On average, police handcuffed a child in a mental health crisis more than twice a week in the county. The study recommends taking an alternative approach by expanding programs that send out mental health experts instead of law enforcement.

The use of handcuffs on children, especially those in a mental health crisis, is a controversial and traumatic practice that requires further attention and alternative approaches to better support the well-being of vulnerable children.

UN guidelines on handcuffing children

While there are no explicit UN guidelines on handcuffing children, the United Nations does have a Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which outlines that children should only be restrained when there is an immediate threat of injury to themselves or others, and only when all other options have been exhausted. This is further reinforced by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in their General Comment 24. The UNCRC also emphasizes that children should be treated with humanity and respect for their dignity, taking into account their age and abilities.

Instances of handcuffing children have been reported in various contexts, including in airports, care homes, and schools. In the UK, there have been reports of migrant children being handcuffed by Border Force staff at airports, prompting politicians to call for stricter regulations and transparency. Similarly, in the US, there have been incidents of children being handcuffed in schools, with a particular case involving elementary school children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

The practice of handcuffing children has been widely criticized as "horrendous" and traumatic, with campaigns emerging to ban its use. Former care home residents have shared their distressing experiences of feeling violated and treated like criminals during transport between care homes.

To address these concerns, some regions have taken initiatives to implement guidelines and regulations. For example, the Welsh government introduced guidelines to protect children in care from unnecessary restraint during transportation. These guidelines mandate reporting any use of restraints by transport providers.

While the UN does not provide specific guidelines on handcuffing children, the broader framework of the UNCRC and related commentaries offer important principles for protecting children's rights and ensuring their dignity, even in situations where restraint may be considered necessary as a last resort.

Frequently asked questions