Heated Runways: Which Airports Offer This Luxury?

While heated runways are not common, they do exist. Norwich Airport in Hellesdon, Norfolk, is set to install the world's first under-runway heating system, a £16 million upgrade designed to prevent fog and ice from causing flight delays and cancellations. This small airport, the 28th busiest in the UK, hopes to improve operations and safety with this new technology. However, some critics argue that heating the airport lounge and upgrading refreshments should have been a higher priority.

The high costs of installation and operation are the main barriers to wider adoption. For example, it is estimated that installing a heating system in the busiest areas of an average-sized airport would cost around $200 million. Additionally, the amount of power required to keep runways ice-free is substantial, and the associated costs are likely to outweigh any potential benefits.

Another challenge is managing the meltwater from heated surfaces, which can cause safety issues if not properly addressed. Furthermore, there are certain weather situations where a heated surface could create more hazards and increase the need for mechanical snow removal. These factors, along with the availability of alternative snow removal methods, make heated runways an uncommon choice for airports.

The high costs of installing heated runways

Heated runways are not common because of the high costs of installing and maintaining them. Firstly, the installation costs of heated runways are very high. Installing an electric heating system under a 150 x 10,000-foot runway costs around $53 million. This cost can go up to $200 million for the busiest areas of an average-sized airport.

Secondly, the operational costs of heated runways are also significant. The high amount of power needed to keep the runways heated translates to high energy costs. For instance, it would cost Chicago O'Hare airport at least $100,000 per hour of a snowstorm to melt the snow on their runways.

Thirdly, the costs of managing meltwater from the heated surfaces can be substantial. If not properly designed, the meltwater can cause safety issues and increase the need for mechanical snow removal.

Finally, the cost of operating heated runways may outweigh the potential savings in de-icing chemicals and mechanical snow removal, and only provide a marginal safety benefit. Therefore, the high costs of installing and operating heated runways make it challenging for airports to justify their implementation.

The energy needed to power heated runways

The energy requirements to power heated runways are immense. An engineer's estimate suggests that a snow-melting system requires 320 watts per meter for the duration of a snowfall. For context, Chicago O'Hare Airport's eight runways, totalling 23,432 meters in length, would need 600,000 kWh of power for each hour of a snowstorm. At current Illinois power prices, this would equate to a staggering $100,000 per hour.

The cost of installation and operation of heated runways is another critical factor. The technology to heat a runway in the busiest areas of an average-sized airport is estimated to cost around $200 million. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) estimates that it would cost $53 million to install electric heating wires on a 150 x 10,000-foot runway, with an hourly operating cost of $8,250.

These exorbitant energy costs and installation expenses highlight why heated runways have not gained widespread adoption. Airports often opt for more cost-effective methods, such as using plows and sweepers, or chemical deicers, to clear runways and taxiways, despite the delays these operations may cause.

However, it is worth noting that researchers are exploring alternative energy sources for heated runways. For example, Joseph Daniels and Ernest Heymsfield of the University of Arkansas are developing a solar-powered runway heating system, which has the potential to reduce costs and environmental impacts.

While heated runways may seem like a convenient solution to winter weather delays, the energy demands and associated costs currently make them impractical for most airports.

The environmental impact of heated runways

Firstly, the energy demand for large-scale runway heating would contribute to increased carbon emissions. The vast expanse of airport runways, often covering several acres, would require an enormous amount of energy to maintain above-freezing temperatures. This energy consumption would result in a significant carbon footprint, counteracting the aviation industry's efforts to reduce its environmental impact.

Secondly, the structural integrity of the pavement could be compromised by rapid temperature changes. Concrete or asphalt runways are designed to withstand the immense forces exerted by landing aircraft. However, the extreme temperature fluctuations caused by heating systems could lead to expansion and contraction, resulting in surface cracks and damage. This not only affects the durability of the runway but also poses safety risks for aircraft operations.

Additionally, the management of meltwater from heated surfaces presents challenges. In certain weather conditions, the effective disposal of melted snow and ice is crucial to maintaining safe runway conditions. Improper management of meltwater can lead to safety issues, such as standing water or refrozen ice, which can be more hazardous than snow accumulation.

Furthermore, the use of heated runways may impact wildlife and surrounding ecosystems. The heat generated to maintain ice- and snow-free pavement could alter the local habitat, potentially affecting nearby vegetation, wildlife behaviour, and ecological balance. This disruption to the natural environment could have far-reaching consequences for the surrounding area.

Lastly, the environmental impact of chemical de-icers currently used by airports cannot be overlooked. While heated runways could reduce the need for chemical treatments, the improper use or disposal of these chemicals can have detrimental effects on the environment. Airports must carefully consider the trade-offs between mechanical and chemical methods for snow and ice removal to minimise their ecological footprint.

In conclusion, while heated runways offer potential benefits in terms of safety and operations, their environmental implications are significant. Airport authorities must carefully weigh these factors and explore sustainable alternatives, such as advanced runway materials and efficient snow removal technologies, to ensure safe and environmentally responsible air travel during winter conditions.

The potential safety issues of heated runways

Heated runways are not a common feature at airports, despite the allure of their promise to reduce delays and cancellations caused by snow and ice. While heated runways could potentially enhance passenger safety, there are several safety issues that need to be considered.

One of the main challenges with heated runways is the management of meltwater. If not properly designed, the runoff from melted ice and snow can pose safety hazards and even increase the need for mechanical snow removal. In certain weather conditions, a heated runway could create safety issues by causing an increase in mechanical snow removal requirements.

The power requirements for heated runways are also a significant concern. The vast amount of energy needed to heat such large surfaces can result in high operational costs, which may outweigh any potential benefits. Additionally, the heat generated can cause air turbulence, affecting the landing of aircraft.

Another safety issue to consider is the potential impact on aircraft tires. The extreme pressure exerted by landing aircraft, especially jumbo jets, could pose a challenge for pavement warming systems, raising questions about their durability.

Furthermore, the formation of ice on aircraft wings and other critical components remains a safety concern, even with heated runways. In extremely cold temperatures, ice can still form on the plane, and taking off or landing on a heated runway may not be enough to mitigate this risk.

While heated runways may seem like a promising solution to winter weather delays, the potential safety issues underscore the need for thorough research and careful implementation. The high costs and technical challenges associated with heated runways mean that, for now, they are not a widely adopted solution for airports dealing with snow and ice.

Alternatives to heated runways

Chemical de-icers

Compounds of either sodium and formic acid (solid granular material), or potassium and formic acid (liquid de-icer) are used to prevent the formation of ice. These chemicals are applied to the runway surface before freezing sets in.

Mechanical snow removal

Snow ploughs and other equipment can be used to remove snow from runways. This is an effective method, with Toronto Pearson Airport employing this strategy to stay operational with minimal downtime.

Solar-powered runway heating systems

Researchers at the University of Arkansas have developed a solar-powered runway heating system, which has the potential to be used for wider applications at the airport, such as water heating. However, this technology still poses cost challenges.

Other strategies

Airports need to have access to accurate weather forecasts and employ trained teams to deal with snowfall.

Frequently asked questions