Airports And Cell Reception: A Complex Interference Story

Many people have experienced poor cell phone reception at airports, and there are several reasons for this. Airports are large areas where planes take off and land, making them unsuitable for cell towers. Instead, cell towers are usually located on the outskirts of airports, which can result in coverage issues due to the distance from the terminals. Additionally, the design of airport terminals and aircraft can hinder cell signals. The materials used in some aircraft, such as wire rebar in Boeing 787s, can interfere with cell signals. The high number of people using their cell phones simultaneously in airports and on planes can also overload cell towers, affecting reception.

Cell towers are generally located on the outskirts of airports, creating coverage issues

Christopher Schaberg from The Atlantic investigated the cause of poor cell reception on airplanes and in airports, deeming them "giant swathes of empty space where large vehicles exit and enter the sky." This makes airports poor candidates for cell towers. As a result, cell towers are generally located on the outskirts of airports, creating coverage issues. With so much space between the cell towers and the terminal areas, coverage can be challenging.

Airports often use distributed antenna systems (DAS) to combat coverage issues. These are small, targeted cell-access points that extend the coverage area without needing a large cell tower to be erected in the middle of the airport. However, DAS systems work best in indoor, controlled spaces. Open-spaced terminals with high ceilings, large airfields, and airport tarmacs filled with moving planes and vehicles are not ideal for DAS systems.

Once on a plane, you are farther away from the DAS systems in the terminal and closer to the larger cell towers on the airport's outer edges. Onboard Wi-Fi systems can further confuse your phone, making it difficult to establish a stable connection. Modern airliners also have electronic-systems shielding to protect cabin equipment from third-party signals, which can hinder cell signals.

Aircraft models also use structural materials that interfere with cell signals. For example, the Boeing 787 reportedly uses wire rebar for structural integrity, impacting cell signals. The suboptimal layout of airports and terminals, the limitations of DAS systems, and the design of planes themselves can all contribute to the challenge of maintaining a stable cell connection in and around airports.

Distributed antenna systems (DAS) are used to extend coverage, but they work best in indoor, controlled spaces

Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) are a network of spatially separated antenna nodes connected to a common source via a transport medium that provides wireless service within a geographic area or structure. They are used to extend and enhance wireless communication and connectivity in specific areas.

DAS systems are typically mobile network agnostic and can support multiple frequencies, allowing them to handle signals from different communication providers and other wireless services simultaneously. They are often used in scenarios where alternative technologies are not feasible due to terrain or zoning challenges.

DAS systems are particularly useful in large buildings, such as stadiums, corporate headquarters, hospitals, shopping malls, and airports, where they can provide improved network coverage and enhanced data capacity. By distributing signal coverage throughout the structure, they ensure that employees, customers, and visitors have consistent and reliable mobile service.

However, DAS systems work best in indoor, controlled spaces. They are less effective in open-spaced terminals with high ceilings, large airfields, and airport tarmacs with moving planes and vehicles. These areas present challenges for DAS systems due to the distance from the DAS nodes, the presence of interfering structures, and the dynamic nature of the environment.

In summary, while DAS systems are effective in extending coverage, their performance is influenced by the environment in which they are deployed. They are most effective in indoor, controlled spaces where the placement of nodes can be optimized for consistent coverage.

Electronic-systems shielding in modern airliners protects cabin equipment from third-party signals

In modern airliners, electronic-systems shielding is essential to protect cabin equipment from third-party signals. This is because electromagnetic interference (EMI) can cause severe problems for airplanes, disrupting electronics on the ground and at cruising altitude. EMI can cause vital equipment to deteriorate and malfunction, leading to issues such as loss of information systems, incorrect flight commands, and failing control signals.

EMI can originate from both natural and human-made sources. Natural sources include lightning and solar flares, while human-made sources include personal electronics, radar systems, and other wires in the plane. To combat EMI, plane engineers employ various methods, including choosing the correct enclosure materials, designing sealing gaskets, and creating effective PCB designs.

EMI shielding uses materials that prevent electromagnetic interference by absorbing transmitted signals before they reach sensitive circuits. In the context of modern airliners, electronic-systems shielding ensures that cabin equipment, such as avionics and in-flight Wi-Fi modules, is protected from third-party signals. This shielding helps to prevent interference from other systems within the aircraft and external sources, such as cell phones.

The effectiveness of EMI shielding in aircraft is a complex topic, especially in military aircraft, which require compliance with stringent standards. The challenge lies in balancing the need for effective shielding with unique design specifications and environmental factors, such as exposure to jet fuel or extreme temperatures. Ultimately, the goal of electronic-systems shielding in modern airliners is to ensure the reliability and safety of cabin equipment by protecting it from the potential disruptions caused by third-party signals.

Structural materials used in aircraft models can interfere with cell signals

For instance, the Boeing 787 reportedly uses wire rebar for structural integrity, which can interfere with cell signals on the plane. This is because metal is a common cellular blocking material, and even thin layers of it can absorb and reflect cellular frequency waves.

Additionally, modern aircraft are made with composite materials such as carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), which has a higher strength-to-weight ratio than traditional aluminum. CFRP offers longer service life and reduced maintenance costs, but its composite structure can also interfere with cell signals.

Other structural components of an aircraft, such as the windows, can also hinder cell signals. Windows reflect and refract cellular signals, causing a drop in signal strength.

The design of the aircraft itself can also impact cell signals. The fuselage, or "body" of the aircraft, can be made with either a truss-type or monocoque/semi-monocoque type construction. The truss type is a lightweight framework of steel alloy tubes, while the monocoque type relies mainly on the skin's strength to carry loads. The semi-monocoque design, a combination of the two, is the most common type of fuselage construction and is reinforced with internal longitudinal members. The specific design and materials used in the fuselage can impact cell signals, as certain materials and structures are more conducive to signal transmission than others.

5G networks can interfere with the radio altimeter, an instrument used to guide pilots during landing

There are several reasons why cell reception is often poor at airports. The design of airport terminals and planes can create a "mobile dead zone", with large swathes of empty space and aircraft blocking or bouncing signals. Additionally, cell towers are generally located on the outskirts of the airport, creating distance between the cell towers and the terminal areas.

However, the issue of cell reception at airports is more complex than mere distance or signal blockage. Airports are "giant swathes of empty space where large vehicles exit and exit the sky," making them poor candidates for cell towers. To combat this, airports often use distributed antenna systems (DAS), which are small, targeted cell-access points that extend coverage without the need for large cell towers. However, these systems work best in indoor, controlled spaces, and airport terminals with high ceilings and open spaces present a challenge for DAS effectiveness.

Another factor affecting cell reception at airports is the aircraft themselves. Modern airliners have electronic-systems shielding that protect cabin equipment from external signals, further hindering cell signals. Additionally, structural materials used in aircraft construction, such as wire rebar in Boeing 787s, can interfere with cell signals.

While the above factors contribute to poor cell reception at airports, it is important to note that aircraft themselves do not typically interfere with cell signals. Cell phones are designed to handle constantly changing towers and can manage connections to multiple towers simultaneously.

However, one significant concern regarding cell reception at airports involves the potential interference of 5G networks with radio altimeters, which are instruments used to guide pilots during landing. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States awarded the mobile wireless industry radio spectrum to operate 5G transmissions in the "C-Band," adjacent to the spectrum used by radar altimeters. This decision was made despite warnings from the aviation industry about the potential for interference.

The issue of 5G interference with radio altimeters is a serious safety concern. Interference can result in the loss of radar altitude information or, more dangerously, the generation of incorrect information. Fatal accidents have been linked to incorrect radar altitude data, including the crash of Turkish Airlines Flight 1951 in Amsterdam in 2009.

To address this issue, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has implemented several measures. Airlines have retrofitted aircraft or radar altimeters with filters to achieve higher interference tolerance, and wireless companies have voluntarily limited their deployments and operations to minimize interference. Additionally, the FAA has issued Airworthiness Directives (AD) and special airworthiness information bulletins (SAIB) to restrict certain operations and provide guidance to pilots.

The long-term solution may involve new radar altimeter designs that meet updated standards, ensuring the safe integration of 5G technology with aviation operations.

Frequently asked questions