Airport X-Rays: Are They Safe Or Not?

Airport security systems use metal detectors, backscatter X-ray machines, and cabinet X-ray machines to ensure the safety of travellers. Some security devices use ionizing radiation to scan luggage and create images of what is inside. This type of radiation can cause damage to cells and increase the risk of cancer. However, the dose of radiation received from airport X-ray machines is very low and is not considered harmful to the human body. In this article, we will explore the topic of airport X-ray radiation, addressing concerns about potential health risks and providing insights into the safety measures in place.

X-ray machines emit ionizing radiation, which has enough energy to knock electrons away from atoms

Ionizing radiation is any form of radiation that has enough energy to knock electrons out of atoms or molecules, creating ions. Atoms consist of comparatively large particles (protons and neutrons) in a central nucleus, orbited by smaller particles (electrons). Normally, the number of protons in the center of the atom equals the number of electrons in orbit. An ion is any atom or molecule that does not have the normal number of electrons.

X-rays are a form of electromagnetic radiation similar to radio waves, microwaves, visible light, and gamma rays. X-ray photons are highly energetic and have enough energy to break up molecules and, therefore, damage living cells. When X-rays hit a material, some are absorbed, and others pass through. The higher the energy, the more X-rays will pass through. It is this penetrating power that allows us to take internal images of the human body or objects.

X-rays are commonly produced in X-ray tubes by accelerating electrons through a potential difference and directing them onto a target material. The incoming electrons release X-rays as they slow down in the target. The X-ray photons produced in this manner range in energy from near zero up to the energy of the electrons. An incoming electron may also collide with an atom in the target, kicking out an electron and leaving a vacancy. Another electron may fill the vacancy and, in doing so, release an X-ray photon of a specific energy (a characteristic X-ray).

In airport security screening, body-scanning units can release low levels of backscatter X-ray ionizing radiation and millimeter-wave non-ionizing radiation. However, in the United States, body-scanning units use millimeter-wave technology, which does not use X-rays and does not add to a person's ionizing radiation dose. These millimeter-wave scanners emit far less energy than a cell phone.

The dose of radiation from airport X-ray machines is too low to cause bodily harm

Airport security systems use various devices to ensure the safety of travellers, including metal detectors, backscatter X-ray machines, millimetre wave scanners, and cabinet X-ray machines. While some of these devices emit low levels of radiation, the dose is too low to cause bodily harm.

X-ray machines emit ionizing radiation, a form of electromagnetic energy with high enough energy to knock electrons away from atoms, creating free radicals. These chemically reactive particles can damage DNA and increase the risk of cancer. However, ionizing radiation only impacts health when received in high doses.

According to Dr. Lewis Nelson, professor and chair of emergency medicine at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, the dose of radiation from airport X-ray machines is "so tiny that it's inconsequential". The Health Physics Society estimates that airport X-ray scanners deliver 0.1 microsieverts of radiation per scan, while a typical chest X-ray delivers 100 microsieverts, as per a 2008 study published in the journal Radiology.

Furthermore, travellers are exposed to significantly more radiation during the flight itself than from the airport security scanners. Every minute of air travel exposes passengers to roughly the same amount of radiation as one airport X-ray scan. Even flying every day for a year would result in receiving only a fraction of the ionizing radiation present in the food we consume, as per NASA dose estimates.

In summary, while airport X-ray machines do emit ionizing radiation, the dose is extremely low and does not pose a significant health risk to travellers. The radiation exposure from airport security screening is negligible compared to other sources of radiation in our daily lives, including food, soil, buildings, and the air we breathe.

Millimeter-wave scanners emit non-ionizing radiation, which does not add to a person's ionizing radiation dose

Millimeter-wave scanners are used in airport security systems to keep people safe while travelling. They are one of several types of screening equipment used at airports, including metal detectors, backscatter x-ray machines, and cabinet x-ray machines.

Millimeter-wave scanners use non-ionizing radiation in the form of low-level radio waves to scan a person's body. This technology does not use x-rays and does not add to a person's ionizing radiation dose. Non-ionizing radiation has enough energy to move atoms in a molecule or cause them to vibrate, but not enough to remove electrons from atoms.

The scanner uses two antennas that rotate around a person's body to construct a 3-D image that resembles a fuzzy photo negative. This image is sent to a remote monitor, where it can be reviewed by a TSA agent. If there are no weapons or other potential threats, the screen turns green and shows an "OK". If an object is detected, it will appear on the screen along with a generic body outline to show its location.

Millimeter-wave scanners emit far less energy than a cell phone and are considered safe for use in airport security screening. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has the federal authority to set standards for machines that produce radiation, including millimeter-wave security screening systems, to ensure that they are safe for public use.

Backscatter scanners send out low-energy X-rays that bounce off the skin and are used to create an image

Backscatter scanners are used in airports to detect threats such as weapons, explosives, tools, liquids, narcotics, currency, and other contraband that a person could be carrying under their clothing. They use very low-energy X-rays that reflect back to the machine itself. The X-rays penetrate clothing, bounce off the skin, and return to detectors mounted on the machine's surface. The radiation also bounces off weapons, explosives, or other threats concealed in clothing or lying against the skin.

Backscatter machines produce low-energy X-rays, which have a wavelength of 0.0000000001 meters or 0.0000001 millimeters. In comparison, millimeter-wave scanners produce microwaves with wavelengths between 0.001 meters (1 millimeter) and 0.01 meters (10 millimeters). The waves emitted by millimeter-wave scanners are much larger and, therefore, have less impact on small structures such as human proteins and nucleic acids.

A single backscatter machine includes two radiation sources to image both the front and back of a person without producing any blind spots. Each radiation source is housed in a rectangular structure resembling a large industrial freezer. The two units face each other with a gap between them big enough for a person to stand in.

Backscatter technology is based on the Compton scattering effect of X-rays, a form of ionizing radiation. Unlike traditional X-ray machines, which rely on the transmission of X-rays through the object, backscatter X-ray detects the radiation that reflects from the object and forms an image. The backscatter pattern is dependent on the material property and is good for imaging organic material.

Backscatter X-ray machines are considered "whole-body imagers" or "naked scanners" because they create a detailed full-body image of the person being scanned. The image produced by backscatter technology looks like a chalk etching or a chalk outline. The TSA has installed software that blurs private areas and highlights potential threats.

The amount of radiation received from a backscatter machine equals the amount of cosmic radiation received during two minutes of flight, and the risk of health effects is very low. According to the FDA, the amount of radiation from a backscatter scanner is so minuscule that it is inconsequential. The Health Physics Society estimates that airport X-ray scanners deliver 0.1 microsieverts of radiation per scan, which is far less than the 100 microsieverts delivered by a typical chest X-ray.

While there have been concerns about the potential health risks associated with backscatter scanners, the machines are designed to meet strict safety standards. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has federal authority to set standards for machines that produce radiation, and the FDA has created a webpage comparing the radiation from backscatter X-ray body scanners to other known sources, citing reasons why the technology is considered safe.

The amount of radiation from a backscatter machine equals the amount of cosmic radiation received during two minutes of flight

Airport security systems use various methods to ensure the safety of passengers, including metal detectors, backscatter X-ray machines, millimetre wave scanners, and cabinet X-ray machines. The use of backscatter X-ray machines, in particular, has been a topic of debate due to their emission of ionizing radiation, which can pose health risks at high doses.

Backscatter X-ray machines are used to detect threats such as weapons, explosives, or other contraband items that may be hidden under a person's clothing. These machines work by emitting low-energy X-rays that penetrate clothing and about an inch into the body. The radiation reflects off the body and any concealed objects, creating an image that security personnel can analyse for potential threats.

While backscatter X-ray machines emit ionizing radiation, the dose is considered very low and comparable to the amount of cosmic radiation received during two minutes of flight. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the amount of radiation from a backscatter machine is generally equivalent to the cosmic radiation exposure during a brief period of flight, and the risk of health effects from this radiation is very low.

To put it into perspective, the Health Physics Society estimates that airport X-ray scanners deliver 0.1 microsieverts of radiation per scan, while a typical chest X-ray delivers 100 microsieverts. Additionally, the radiation dose for a six-hour flight is 20 microsieverts, which is 200 to 400 times larger than the dose from a backscatter scan.

It is important to note that the use of backscatter X-ray machines in airports has been controversial due to privacy and health concerns. Some travellers are uncomfortable with the idea of their bodies being scanned and worry about the potential health risks of radiation exposure. However, experts have assured that the radiation dose from these machines is negligible and does not pose a significant health risk.

In summary, while backscatter machines do emit ionizing radiation, the amount of radiation exposure is equivalent to the cosmic radiation received during a short period of flight, and the health risks associated with this level of radiation are considered very low.

Frequently asked questions