Sulley's Return: Exploring The Airport Possibility

On January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549, piloted by Chesley Sully Sullenberger, collided with a flock of birds shortly after takeoff, resulting in the loss of both engines. Faced with the challenging decision of whether to attempt a return to LaGuardia Airport or opt for an alternative landing site, Sullenberger chose the latter, executing a successful ditching of the aircraft on the Hudson River. This choice, though controversial among some pilots, was vindicated by investigations that concluded the immediate turn required to reach LaGuardia was unrealistic and that Sullenberger's actions offered the highest probability of survival.

The National Transportation Safety Board found that Sully could have returned to the airport

On January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549, an Airbus A320, collided with a flock of Canadian geese shortly after taking off from New York City's LaGuardia Airport. The plane lost all engine power, and the pilots, Captain Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles, decided to glide and ditch the plane on the Hudson River. All 155 people on board were rescued, with no fatalities.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) found that it would have been possible for Captain Sullenberger to turn the plane around and return to LaGuardia Airport after the bird strike. In simulations, pilots were able to successfully turn the airliner around and land back at the airport. However, these simulations did not account for real-world considerations, as they assumed an instant decision to turn back with no time to assess the situation.

In reality, Captain Sullenberger would have had to make a split-second decision with little to no time to evaluate the risks. Returning to LaGuardia would have been a risky manoeuvre, as a failed landing attempt could have resulted in a catastrophic crash in a densely populated area.

Captain Sullenberger's decision to land on the Hudson River was praised for its appropriateness given the circumstances. The NTSB affirmed that the ditching of the plane provided the highest probability of survival for those on board. The successful landing and evacuation of all passengers and crew were hailed as a "Miracle on the Hudson" by the Governor of New York State, David Paterson.

Sully decided to land in the Hudson River to avoid densely populated areas

On January 15, 2009, Captain Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and First Officer Jeffrey Skiles were faced with an unprecedented challenge when their US Airways Flight 1549 struck a flock of birds shortly after takeoff from LaGuardia Airport in New York City. With both engines disabled and the plane losing altitude, they were forced to make a split-second decision on where to land. Sullenberger chose to glide the plane towards the Hudson River and ditch it there, rather than attempting to return to LaGuardia or divert to another airport. This decision was made to avoid densely populated areas and ensure the safety of the 155 passengers and crew on board.

Sullenberger's decision to land in the Hudson River was based on several critical factors. Firstly, the plane had lost all engine power due to the bird strike, and their altitude was too low to reach other nearby airports. Landing on water offered a safer option, although it was still incredibly risky. Additionally, Sullenberger knew that attempting to turn back to LaGuardia or divert to another airport would take valuable time and increase the risk of crashing in a populated area. He later wrote, "I knew that if I chose to turn back across this densely populated area, I had to be certain we could make it... Attempting to reach a runway that was unreachable could have had catastrophic consequences for everyone on the airplane and who knows how many people on the ground."

The successful ditching in the Hudson River, near Midtown Manhattan, was later hailed as a "Miracle on the Hudson" by New York State Governor David Paterson. All 155 people on board were rescued by nearby boats, and there were no fatalities. While some armchair critics have questioned Sullenberger's decision, it's important to understand the time constraints and the risk of crashing in a populated area. Flight simulations that showed the plane could have returned to LaGuardia did not account for the real-world considerations and the need to assess the situation before turning back.

Sullenberger's quick thinking and expertise played a crucial role in the successful landing and evacuation. He remained calm and worked closely with Skiles to manage the crisis. His extensive experience as a pilot, including his time as a fighter pilot in the Air Force, contributed to his ability to make a life-saving decision in a high-pressure situation. Sullenberger's actions not only saved the lives of those on board but also prevented potential casualties on the ground.

In the aftermath of the incident, Sullenberger became an outspoken advocate for aviation safety and worked on developing new protocols to enhance flight safety. He was recognized for his heroism and received numerous awards, including the Master's Medal from the Guild of Air Pilots and Air Navigators. His actions during the emergency landing on the Hudson River demonstrated exceptional skill, quick thinking, and a strong commitment to the safety of those on board.

Sully's decision was praised by Airbus

On January 15, 2009, Captain Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and First Officer Jeffrey Skiles were piloting US Airways Flight 1549 from LaGuardia Airport in New York City. Shortly after takeoff, the Airbus A320 struck a flock of birds, causing both engines to fail. Sullenberger and Skiles decided to ditch the aircraft on the Hudson River, and all 155 passengers and crew were successfully evacuated with no fatalities.

The decision to land on the Hudson River was met with some criticism, as flight simulations showed that the plane could have returned to LaGuardia Airport if it had turned back immediately after the bird strike. However, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) affirmed that these simulations did not account for real-world considerations, and Sullenberger's decision provided the highest probability of survival given the circumstances.

Airbus, the manufacturer of the A320, praised Sullenberger's decision and recognised his actions as a "heroic and unique aviation achievement". They acknowledged that the normal procedures for engine loss are designed for cruising altitudes, not immediately after takeoff, and that attempting to return to LaGuardia Airport could have resulted in a crash within a densely populated area.

Sullenberger's expertise and quick thinking in a high-stakes situation demonstrated his exceptional skills as a pilot and his commitment to ensuring the safety of those on board. His actions not only saved the lives of the passengers and crew but also prevented potential casualties on the ground. Airbus's recognition of Sullenberger's decision highlights the importance of prioritising safety and making timely decisions in critical situations.

All 155 passengers and crew were rescued from the Hudson River

On January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549, an Airbus A320, took off from LaGuardia Airport in New York City, bound for Charlotte and Seattle. Shortly after takeoff, the plane struck a flock of birds, causing a loss of power in both engines. With 155 people on board, pilots Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles made the quick decision to glide the plane towards the Hudson River, near Midtown Manhattan, for an emergency landing.

The successful landing on the Hudson River, dubbed the "Miracle on the Hudson", saw all 155 passengers and crew rescued by nearby boats within 24 minutes of the crash landing. The swift response from various boats, including ferries and Coast Guard vessels, ensured that everyone on board was safely evacuated from the partially submerged plane. The last person was taken off the plane at 15:55, approximately 25 minutes after the bird strike.

The rescue efforts were aided by the New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System (NYHOPS), which provided critical data on wind and water conditions, including water temperature, current speed, and direction. This information helped rescuers position their boats and ambulances effectively, taking into account the strong currents of up to four knots that could have complicated the rescue. The availability of this data was crucial in ensuring the successful rescue of all 155 passengers and crew members.

The Hudson River landing and subsequent rescue operation were a testament to the skill and heroism of the flight crew and the swift response of the emergency responders. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) described it as "the most successful ditching in aviation history."

Sully's decision was based on the highest probability of survival

On January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549, piloted by Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles, struck a flock of birds shortly after takeoff from LaGuardia Airport, resulting in the loss of both engines. In the aftermath, Sullenberger's decision to glide the plane into the Hudson River, instead of attempting to return to LaGuardia or divert to Teterboro Airport, has been the subject of much discussion and scrutiny.

While flight simulations showed that returning to LaGuardia was technically possible, these scenarios did not account for real-world considerations. Sullenberger himself emphasized the importance of certainty in such situations, stating that turning back towards the airport would have been an irrevocable choice. He further asserted that attempting to reach an unreachable runway could have resulted in a catastrophic outcome for those on board and individuals on the ground.

Sullenberger's decision was based on the highest probability of survival for everyone involved. By opting for the Hudson River ditching, he prioritized the safety of his passengers and crew, as well as the people on the ground. This decision was affirmed by the National Transportation Safety Board, which concluded that the ditching provided the highest probability of survival given the circumstances.

The consequences of attempting to return to LaGuardia or diverting to another airport were too risky to consider. Sullenberger recognized that even a slight miscalculation or unforeseen complication could have led to a disastrous outcome. Therefore, by choosing the Hudson River, Sullenberger selected the option that offered the greatest chance of a successful outcome, given the limited time available to assess the situation and make a decision.

In conclusion, Sullenberger's decision to glide the plane into the Hudson River was based on his professional judgment and expertise, prioritizing the safety and well-being of everyone involved. While some may speculate about alternative choices, the successful outcome, with all 155 people on board rescued and no fatalities, validates his decision as the best course of action in that critical situation.

Frequently asked questions