Small Airports, Big Ambitions: Commercial Flights' Accessibility

Small airports are defined by their lack of commercial flights, but some still offer a small number of commercial services. These airports are often kept running by government grants, and other sources of income such as fuel sales, hangar rental, and enplanement fees. Commercial airlines are cutting flights to regional airports, with some small airports losing commercial services entirely. However, private jets can access all commercial airports, and some small airports, that commercial airlines can't.

Commercial airlines are cutting flights to small airports

Firstly, larger airlines tend to be geared towards big airplanes moving many people from hub to hub. Smaller airlines, on the other hand, can concentrate on smaller cities and provide better service with direct flights to more markets. This is known as the hub-and-spoke model, where flights from smaller airports are routed through big, central hubs. As a result, larger airlines may cut flights to smaller airports as they are not as profitable.

Secondly, smaller, dedicated regional airports offer more flexibility and are much easier for executive jets to navigate. At large commercial airports, private jets often face long holding patterns before landing and challenges on the runway due to the speed and size of commercial airliners. Additionally, parking and security procedures are more complicated at larger airports, which may require private jets to be held in cargo facilities.

Finally, reduced demand for services at small airports has also contributed to commercial airlines cutting flights. This is particularly true for airports serving small communities, where the number of passengers may not justify the cost of operating a flight. In some cases, this has resulted in entire airports losing their only airline service.

The impact of these changes is being felt across the aviation industry. While some small airports have benefited from the creation of new airlines that focus on underused airports, others have struggled to maintain operations. Ultimately, the trend towards larger airlines cutting flights to small airports is likely to continue, shaping the future of the aviation industry.

Small airports can survive due to government grants

Federal grants, for instance, contribute significantly more to smaller airports than to larger ones. In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP) provides grants for the planning and development of public-use airports included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). The NPIAS ensures that airports across the country are well-maintained and can accommodate demand and interstate commerce.

State governments may also provide funding for aviation as part of their transportation programs. This funding is typically distributed by departments of transportation and aviation, and airports may be eligible for economic development funds depending on the nature of the project. Additionally, state grants can be used to fund projects that are not eligible for AIP funding or to supplement AIP grants.

Local funding for small airports is generally provided through tax revenue and usage fees collected by the airport sponsor or operator. In some cases, small airports sponsored by cities, counties, or states may receive their entire operating budget from the sponsor's general fund. Local funding may also be used to cover capital costs or supplement state and FAA grants.

Furthermore, small airports can generate revenue through various fees and rents. They collect fees from fuel sales, hangar rental, enplanement charges, landing fees, and parking charges. Some airports also receive income from sources such as car rental commissions and rents from non-aviation businesses, such as airline offices, car rental offices, and trailer parks.

However, despite these revenue streams, small airports heavily rely on government grants to survive. These grants enable them to maintain operations, make capital improvements, and support their local communities and economies.

Private jets often prefer smaller airports

Secondly, smaller airports offer more flexibility and are generally more accessible for executive jets. At large airports, private jets may face challenges on the runway, as they are asked to maintain higher speeds to avoid stacking up behind commercial jets, which can be demanding even for experienced pilots. Smaller airports also provide a more efficient setup for private jets, with separate private hangars known as Fixed Base Operators (FBOs) for boarding, offering a more exclusive and VIP experience.

Thirdly, smaller airports are often located closer to the passenger's ultimate destination, reducing the time spent travelling to and from the airport. This convenience is a significant factor in choosing a smaller airport over a larger one.

Lastly, smaller airports tend to have lower costs associated with them. Landing and handling fees at large airports can be significantly higher, making smaller airports a more cost-effective option for private jet clients.

While private jets can access the same airports as commercial airlines, the various advantages offered by smaller airports make them a preferred choice for private jet travellers, ultimately providing a more efficient, convenient, and luxurious experience.

Commercial flights have priority for landing and takeoff slots

While small airports do have commercial flights, these flights are often subsidised by the location. Commercial flights are often prioritised for landing and takeoff slots at large airports, which can make it difficult for private jets to get slots at these airports. This is because commercial flights are considered to have more significant commercial value for big airports. As a result, private jets often opt for smaller regional airports, which are less congested and offer more flexibility.

At high-density airports, landing and takeoff slots are allocated to aircraft within 30 minutes of their request. These slots are usually two to four minutes apart to help mitigate congestion. However, at some airports, such as in the United States, aviation is typically first-come, first-served, unless there is an emergency or a medivac. In Europe, flights need to be on a flight plan to be given priority. While there is no priority given to commercial or private aircraft in such cases, commercial flights are still more likely to get priority due to the number of passengers on board.

In certain situations, commercial flights may be given priority. For instance, during the noon rush hour at Zurich Airport, flights are given airport-assigned CTOT (Calculated Take-Off Times). Commercial flights carrying a large number of passengers will be given priority in such cases. Similarly, during ski season, airports like Aspen in Colorado and Park City in Utah experience high demand. These airports do not permit night-time landings due to the surrounding mountainous terrain, so commercial flights are likely to be given priority to ensure they can land during the day.

Small airports can offer a more VIP experience

Small airports can indeed offer a more VIP experience. While small airports may not have the capacity to accommodate large commercial airliners, they are often used by private jets. This means that they can offer a more exclusive, less crowded experience.

Benefits of small airports

Small airports are much easier for executive jets to navigate. They are less busy, so there is less chance of being put into a "holding pattern" before landing, and the runways are less likely to be shared with large commercial jets. This makes the approach and landing much smoother for private pilots. Smaller airports are also more easily accessible, with less congested roads and a more convenient location in relation to the traveller's final destination.

VIP services

Some small airports offer VIP services, which can include private lounges, vehicle transfers directly to the aircraft, expedited security and customs checks, and assistance with luggage. These services can be purchased separately or as part of a package. For example, the Heathrow VIP service in London includes a luxury car collection from your home, a private lounge, and a private luxury vehicle transfer directly to the aircraft.

Privacy and discretion

Small airports are also ideal for those seeking privacy and discretion. With fewer people around, it is easier to keep a low profile and avoid unwanted attention. This can be especially important for high-profile individuals or those travelling for business.

Efficiency

The reduced size and busyness of small airports can also make them more efficient. There are often shorter lines for security and customs, and less distance to travel within the airport. This can save time and reduce the stress of travelling.

In summary, small airports can offer a more VIP experience by providing a more exclusive, efficient, and discreet service. They are also more easily navigable for private jets and are often located closer to the traveller's final destination.

Frequently asked questions