Airport Scanners And Radiation: What's The Deal?

Airport body scanners have been a source of concern for travellers, with many worrying about their radiation exposure. While it is true that airport scanners emit radiation, the dose is extremely low and is not considered harmful to humans. According to experts, the amount of radiation from an airport scanner is minuscule in comparison to a medical X-ray or the radiation exposure during air travel. In this article, we will explore the topic of airport scanners and radiation, addressing concerns about health risks and providing insights into the technology used in these scanners.

Airport scanners emit low-level radiation

The radiation dose from these scanners is extremely low and is not considered harmful to humans. According to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the radiation emitted by backscatter X-ray scanners is equivalent to the radiation one would be exposed to inside an aircraft flying for two minutes at 30,000 feet. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP) has classified this dose as a "Negligible Individual Dose".

To put it into perspective, an individual would need to undergo more than 50 airport scans to equal the exposure of a single dental X-ray, and over 1,000 scans to equal the exposure of a standard chest X-ray. The American College of Radiology (ACR) agrees that there is no evidence that either of these scanning technologies would present significant biological effects for passengers.

While some people may have concerns about radiation exposure from airport scanners, the risk of harm is negligible. The amount of radiation delivered by an airport X-ray machine is minuscule compared to other sources of radiation we encounter daily, such as food, soil, and even the air we breathe.

In summary, while airport scanners do emit low-level radiation, the doses are extremely low and do not pose a significant health risk to individuals.

Radiation is ionizing or non-ionizing

There are two types of radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing. Ionizing radiation is a form of energy that acts by removing electrons from atoms and molecules of materials, including air, water, and living tissue. These electrons create free radicals, which can cause damage to DNA and increase the risk of cancer. X-rays, gamma rays, and alpha and beta particles are all examples of ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation can have hazardous effects on human health, especially at moderate to high doses. At low doses, cells can repair biological damage caused by ionizing radiation rapidly, but at moderate doses, cells can be permanently changed, leading to cancer or other abnormalities.

Non-ionizing radiation, on the other hand, does not have enough energy to remove electrons from atoms or molecules. It includes ultraviolet (UV) light, visible light, infrared radiation, microwaves, and radio waves. While non-ionizing radiation is generally safer, exposure to high-intensity sources, particularly in occupational settings, can result in tissue damage due to heat. Examples of this include exposure to industrial devices that emit high-intensity infrared, radiofrequency, or microwave radiation.

Airport body scanners use two types of technology: millimeter wave scanners and backscatter X-ray scanners. Millimeter wave scanners emit extremely low-energy waves, similar to those emitted by cell phones, and are a form of non-ionizing radiation. Backscatter X-ray scanners, on the other hand, utilize very low-dose X-rays, which are a form of ionizing radiation. While the use of ionizing radiation in backscatter X-ray scanners has raised concerns, the dose emitted by these scanners is extremely low. According to Dr. Lewis Nelson, a professor at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, the dose is "so tiny that it's inconsequential."

The Health Physics Society estimates that airport X-ray scanners deliver 0.1 microsieverts of radiation per scan, which is significantly lower than the radiation exposure from a typical chest X-ray, which delivers 100 microsieverts. Furthermore, passengers are exposed to higher levels of radiation during the flight itself, with each minute of flight time delivering a similar dose of radiation as one airport X-ray scan.

In conclusion, while airport body scanners use ionizing radiation, the dose is extremely low and is considered safe by experts. The primary concern with airport scanners relates to privacy rather than radiation exposure.

The impact of radiation depends on the dose

The impact of radiation on the human body depends on several factors, including the radiation dose, the type of radiation, and individual sensitivity. While radiation can have adverse effects on health, the dose plays a crucial role in determining the severity of these effects.

At high doses, radiation can cause Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) or Cutaneous Radiation Injuries (CRI). It can also lead to serious injury or death. Such high doses are far above regulatory safety limits. The impact of radiation at these doses can be life-threatening and can cause immediate health issues.

On the other hand, low doses of radiation, such as those encountered in the environment or from airport scanners, do not cause immediate health effects. The amount of radiation from airport scanners is extremely low and is comparable to the radiation exposure from natural sources or even a fraction of the radiation we absorb from food. The dose of radiation from a typical chest X-ray is about 1,000 times higher than that of an airport scanner.

While low doses of radiation do not have immediate consequences, they can contribute to a small increase in the risk of long-term effects such as cancer. The risk of cancer increases as the dose of radiation increases. However, it's important to note that the risk of cancer from airport scanners is minuscule compared to the risk from other sources, such as medical X-rays or radiation during air travel.

The impact of radiation also depends on individual sensitivity. For example, developing fetuses, children, and people with compromised immune systems are more vulnerable to the effects of radiation. Children have rapidly dividing cells and growing tissues, providing more opportunities for radiation to cause damage. Additionally, they have a longer lifespan ahead of them, giving cancers more time to develop.

Airport scanners emit non-harmful radiation

The amount of radiation from airport scanners is negligible compared to other sources of radiation exposure. For example, an individual would need to undergo more than 50 airport scans to equal the exposure of a single dental x-ray, and over 200,000 scans to equal the exposure of a single abdominal and pelvic CT scan. Additionally, the radiation exposure from a single scan is equivalent to just a few minutes of radiation received from naturally occurring sources or during a flight.

While there have been concerns raised about the potential health risks of airport scanners, particularly the backscatter x-ray scanners, the consensus among experts is that the radiation doses are too low to cause any significant harm. The American College of Radiology (ACR) agrees with the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement's (NCRP) conclusion that a traveler would need to experience 100 backscatter scans per year to reach a Negligible Individual Dose. Furthermore, the ACR states that they are not aware of any evidence that either of the scanning technologies presents significant biological effects for passengers screened.

In summary, while airport scanners do emit ionizing radiation, the doses are extremely low and are not considered harmful. The radiation exposure from a single scan is equivalent to a small fraction of the radiation received from other sources, such as medical x-rays or air travel. Experts agree that the potential health risks from airport scanners are negligible, and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise.

Flying exposes you to more radiation than airport scanners

Airports use body-scanning units to detect contraband hidden under clothing. There are two types of full-body scanners: millimeter-wave scanners and backscatter X-ray scanners.

Millimeter-wave scanners emit extremely low-energy waves, similar to those emitted by cell phones. The scanner captures the reflected energy to create a 3D image. This method does not use X-rays and does not contribute to ionizing radiation exposure.

Backscatter X-ray scanners, on the other hand, utilize very low-dose X-rays, similar to those used in medical imaging. This type of scanner can reveal objects hidden under clothing as it uses ionizing radiation, which can remove electrons from atoms and potentially damage DNA.

While both types of scanners emit low levels of radiation, the dose is not high enough to cause any harm. The radiation exposure from a single scan is equivalent to just a few minutes of radiation received from naturally occurring sources or flying.

For example, a chest X-ray exposes patients to roughly 1,000 times the radiation of an airport scanner. Furthermore, travelers are exposed to far more radiation during the flight itself than from the scanner. Every minute of flight time delivers roughly the same dose of radiation as one airport X-ray scan.

Therefore, while airport scanners do emit radiation, the amount is negligible compared to other sources, and flying exposes individuals to more radiation than the scanners themselves.

Frequently asked questions