Body Scanners: Nudity Exposure Or Privacy Protection?

Airport body scanners are used to detect objects on or inside a person's body for security screening purposes, without physically removing clothes or making physical contact. While older versions of the scanners produced nude images, current technology uses generic, cartoon-like outlines of the human body to indicate areas that may need additional screening. These images are not detailed and do not reveal a person's naked body or the insides of their body.

Do airport body scanners show nudity?

Airport body scanners do not show nudity. The scanners use millimetre-wave technology, which does not emit X-rays and does not pose any health risks. Instead of revealing a person's naked body, the scanners display a generic human shape, without any specific identifying features, that resembles a doll. This generic outline is the same for every traveller and is used to ensure passenger privacy.

The millimetre-wave technology used by airport body scanners only checks the contour of the body and does not detect what is inside a person's body. This means that the scanners cannot identify health issues such as tumours or inflammation.

While the scanners do not show nudity, they are capable of detecting metal and non-metal objects that may be concealed under clothing. This includes items such as weapons, explosives, and drugs. If something suspicious is detected, the scanner will display a 'gingerbread man' image with a red 'stop and check' signal, indicating that a physical search is needed.

It is important to note that passengers can refuse to be scanned by the body scanners and opt for an alternative method of screening, such as a pat-down. However, this alternative method may involve a physical inspection of sensitive medical equipment or prosthetics, which some individuals may find embarrassing.

What are the different types of airport body scanners?

There are several types of airport body scanners, each with a different screening purpose. Here are the details of each type:

Millimeter Wave Scanners

Millimeter wave scanners use non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation in the extremely high frequency (EHF) radio band. This type of scanner does not generate ionizing radiation, and the health risks posed by these machines are still being studied. Millimeter wave scanners are important for airport security as they can detect hidden threats such as guns and knives. When someone is scanned and no weapons or other potential threats are detected, the screen turns green and shows an "OK." If an object is detected, it will appear on the screen along with a generic body outline to indicate the location of the object.

Backscatter X-Ray Scanners

Backscatter X-ray scanners use low-dose radiation to detect suspicious metallic and non-metallic objects hidden under clothing, in shoes, or in body cavities. The dosage of radiation received is typically between 0.05 and 0.1 μSv. Due to safety concerns, multiple countries have banned the use of these scanners.

Transmission X-Ray Scanners

Transmission X-ray scanners use higher-dose penetrating radiation that passes through the human body and is then captured by a detector or array of detectors. This type of scanner can detect objects hidden under clothing or inside the body, such as drugs swallowed by drug couriers. The usual dosage received is not higher than 0.25 μSv and is regulated by American radiation safety standards.

Infra-Red Thermal Conductivity Scanners

Infra-Red thermal conductivity scanners do not use electromagnetic radiation to penetrate the body or clothing. Instead, they rely on slight temperature differences on the surface of clothing to detect foreign objects. This technology uses warm air to heat up the surface of the clothing, and the rate at which the clothing cools depends on what is beneath it. Items that cool the clothing faster or slower than the skin surface will be identified by a thermal image. These scanners are less commonly used compared to X-ray-based and millimeter wave scanners.

Are airport body scanners safe?

The safety of airport body scanners has been a topic of debate for many years. While some argue that the technology is safe, others question its potential health risks and efficacy in preventing terrorist attacks. Here is an overview of the different perspectives on the safety of airport body scanners:

The Case for Safety:

• Government Research and Regulations: According to government research in the UK, airport body scanners are safe and less invasive than mobile phones or sunlight exposure. They are also certified as safe for pregnant women, children, and individuals with medical implants such as pacemakers. Additionally, guidelines and safety measures are in place to ensure that airport screening equipment meets specific standards and does not expose workers and travelers to high levels of radiation.
• Low Radiation Exposure: Airport body scanners, especially those using millimeter-wave technology, emit very low levels of radiation. The dose of radiation received from a scan is minuscule and comparable to the natural background radiation we encounter daily. It is significantly lower than the radiation exposure from medical X-rays or during air travel.
• Non-Ionizing Radiation: Most airport body scanners use non-ionizing radiation, which has insufficient energy to remove electrons from atoms. This type of radiation is present in everyday technologies like cell phones, Wi-Fi signals, and microwave ovens.
• Health Organization Assessments: The World Health Organization's electromagnetic field project has not found conclusive evidence of health risks associated with airport body scanners. While there may be some interaction with the human body, the low intensity and penetration depth of millimeter waves during the short scan duration are generally deemed acceptable.
• Comparison to Other Technologies: Airport body scanners are often compared to mobile X-ray machines used in medical settings. The radiation dose from an airport body scanner is significantly lower than that of a typical chest X-ray or other medical imaging procedures.

The Case for Potential Risks and Concerns:

• Radiation Exposure: While the radiation dose is low, some individuals, especially frequent flyers, may be concerned about cumulative radiation exposure over time. Additionally, there is a lack of long-term studies on the health effects of chronic exposure to non-ionizing radiation.
• Ineffectiveness and False Positives: Critics argue that body scanners have not proven to be effective in preventing terrorist attacks. The Heritage Foundation's compilation of terrorist plots since 9/11 indicates that no post-2009 events were foiled by advanced imaging technology (AIT). Additionally, body scanners have high false-positive rates, leading to unnecessary pat-downs and potential privacy invasions.
• Privacy Concerns: Early versions of body scanners displayed detailed images of passengers' bodies, raising privacy and ethical concerns. Although newer scanners use generic avatars, some passengers still feel uncomfortable with the level of detail revealed in the scans.
• Lack of Transparency: The implementation of AIT in airports was done with minimal transparency, and passengers were not adequately informed about the technology's benefits and potential risks. This lack of clear communication has contributed to ongoing skepticism and distrust.
• Questionable Efficacy: Some experts argue that body scanners are expensive and ineffective compared to alternative security measures, such as metal detectors, canine units, or behavioral profiling.

In conclusion, while government and health organizations generally consider airport body scanners safe, concerns about radiation exposure, efficacy, privacy, and transparency persist. Individuals have the right to opt out of body scans and request alternative screening methods, such as pat-downs, to address their concerns.

What do airport body scanners detect?

Airport body scanners use either X-ray or millimetre-wave technology to detect objects on or inside a person's body for security screening purposes, without physically removing clothes or making physical contact. They can detect non-metal objects, which became an increasing concern after various airliner bombing attempts in the 2000s.

Millimetre wave scanners use non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation similar to that used by wireless data transmitters. The health risks posed by these machines are still being studied, and the evidence is mixed, though millimetre wave scanners do not generate ionizing radiation.

X-ray scanners use low-dose radiation for detecting suspicious metallic and non-metallic objects hidden under clothing or in shoes and in the cavities of the human body. The dosage of radiation received is usually between 0.05 and 0.1 μSv. Due to concerns about the safety of this method, multiple countries have banned their usage.

Today, in the US, Canada, and the European Union, airport scanners use millimetre-wave technology only. Millimetre-wave technology does not emit X-rays and does not pose any health risks. These scanners detect metal and non-metal objects that may be concealed under clothing and their exact location on your body. However, they do not reveal your naked body or the insides of your body. Instead, airport security staff see a generic human shape, without any specific identifying features, that resembles a doll.

Passengers are allowed to refuse to go through the body scanner and opt for a physical search instead. However, passengers who have been selected for enhanced screening cannot opt out of the full-body scanner.

Can you refuse an airport body scan?

Yes, you can refuse to go through an airport body scanner. However, the machines are there for your safety, and it is important to remain polite and avoid being aggressive or rude to TSA agents. If you refuse the body scan, you will likely be asked to consent to a physical body search or pat-down, which may include an intimate check of private areas. Refusal to consent to any security screening will likely result in denied passage through security and the inability to board your flight.

In some countries, such as Australia, a no opt-out policy is enforced, and passengers who refuse a body scan may be banned from flying. However, individuals with medical or physical conditions that prevent them from undergoing a body scan will be offered alternative screening methods suitable to their circumstances. Similarly, in Canada, passengers selected for secondary screening can choose between a full-body scan or a physical search.

In the UK, the Government's Code of Conduct states that individuals may opt out of being scanned and can choose to be screened by an alternative method, such as an enhanced hand search in private. If an individual refuses both the body scan and the alternative screening method, they will not be permitted to enter the security-restricted area.

It is important to note that the body scanners used in airports today do not show your naked body on the screen. Instead, they provide a generic avatar or "gingerbread man" image to ensure passenger privacy. These images are not stored, transmitted, saved, or printed, and the operator will only see a mannequin outline if areas of concern are detected.

Frequently asked questions