Airports And Covid-19 Testing: What's The Protocol?

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on the travel industry, with airlines facing financial difficulties and a significant decline in travel demand. In an effort to revive the industry, airlines and airports have proposed coronavirus testing as a potential solution. This includes offering testing kits to passengers before boarding or providing rapid tests at the airport. While this approach may help passengers avoid quarantine requirements and reduce the risk of infected individuals boarding planes, it is not a perfect solution. Testing has its limitations, and health experts emphasize that it does not eliminate all health risks associated with flying.

Testing kits are available at some airports, but results can take up to two hours

At Los Angeles International Airport, a design company has announced plans to convert cargo containers into a testing facility with an on-site lab. Similarly, at Heathrow Airport, a testing facility has been set up as part of the Daily Mail's Get Britain Flying campaign. This facility is expected to implement the German model of testing air passengers twice: once before departure and again after a few days of quarantine.

In addition to airport testing, some airlines offer testing kits that can be mailed to passengers' homes, allowing them to collect their own samples and mail them to a laboratory for results. These tests can be purchased in addition to or as an alternative to rapid tests taken at the airport.

While the availability of testing kits at airports provides a convenient option for travellers, it is important to note that coronavirus tests are not 100% accurate. There is also a possibility of false negative results, especially if the test is taken within a few days of infection when virus levels are still low. Therefore, even with negative test results, health experts recommend that passengers continue to wear masks and maintain physical distancing as much as possible when travelling.

Tests can cost between $90 to $250, depending on the airline and type of test

The cost of testing for the coronavirus at airports varies depending on the airline and the type of test being administered. Tests can cost anywhere between $90 to $250. For example, United Airlines offers a rapid test for $250 and a mail-in test for $80. In contrast, Hawaiian Airlines offers a day-of-travel express service for $150 and results within 36 hours for $90.

The variability in pricing is likely due to the different types of tests being offered and the associated costs of each test. For instance, rapid tests, which provide results within minutes, may be more expensive than mail-in tests, which can take a few days to process. Additionally, the location of the testing facility may also influence the cost. Tests administered at the airport or nearby may be more convenient and, therefore, more expensive than tests mailed to the passenger's home.

It is important to note that these tests are not mandatory for passengers and are offered as a way to help reduce the risk of virus transmission during air travel. While testing can provide some reassurance, health experts emphasize that it does not eliminate all risks associated with flying. False negative results, the accuracy of the test, and the timing of testing can all impact the effectiveness of testing in preventing the spread of the virus.

Despite these limitations, the implementation of coronavirus testing at airports is seen as a positive step towards reviving the travel industry, which has been significantly impacted by the pandemic. By offering testing, airlines hope to increase passenger confidence and encourage more people to travel.

Testing is also available via mail-in kits, which can be ordered in advance

Testing for the Coronavirus is available at several airports. However, testing is also available via mail-in kits, which can be ordered in advance. These kits are available from retailers such as Amazon and Walmart, as well as directly from airlines such as United, American, and Hawaiian. The tests cost between $80 and $250, depending on the airline and the type of test.

The process of using a mail-in kit is straightforward. After ordering the kit, it will be delivered to your home. The kit will include a test tube for your saliva sample, a biohazard specimen collection bag, a small absorbent sheet, a box to put the test tube in, and a prepaid shipping label. You will also need to fill in a lab requisition form with your personal information.

Once you have collected your sample, you will need to register your kit online using the ID code found on the saliva collection tube. This will allow you to view your test results when they are ready. After registering, you can mail your sample back to the lab using the prepaid shipping label. Results are typically available within 48 to 72 hours after the lab receives the sample.

It is important to note that mail-in tests may take longer to provide results than in-person testing options. Additionally, the accuracy of these tests can vary, and they may not be suitable for all situations. For example, if you are travelling and need a negative test result to avoid quarantine, a rapid test taken at or near the airport may be a better option.

Testing at airports is not a cure-all, and health experts recommend continued mask-wearing and social distancing

Testing at airports is not a cure-all, and health experts continue to recommend mask-wearing and social distancing. While testing passengers can lower the odds of an infected person boarding a plane and reduce the risk of virus transmission, it is not a perfect solution.

Firstly, coronavirus tests are not 100% accurate and can produce false negatives. Secondly, there is a risk that individuals may contract the virus after being tested a few days in advance. Lastly, optional testing cannot detect the virus in travellers who choose not to be tested. Dr. Timothy Brewer, a professor in the division of infectious diseases at UCLA's David Geffen School of Medicine, acknowledges that while testing may help, it will not eliminate the risk entirely.

Experts also worry about the potential for gridlock at airports if testing expands. They highlight the need to work out logistics and ensure a sufficient supply of rapid tests to accommodate all passengers who request them. Despite these concerns, the airline industry remains hopeful that rapid preflight testing can help revive the struggling travel sector.

Even with testing in place, health experts emphasize that additional precautions are still necessary. Dr. Brewer recommends that passengers continue to wear masks and maintain physical distancing as much as possible while travelling. These measures act as crucial layers of protection, even when testing is implemented.

Testing facilities at airports are being constructed from converted cargo containers

SG Blocks, a designer that specializes in converting cargo containers for other uses, and Grimshaw Architects have announced plans to build a modular coronavirus testing centre at LAX by November 1, 2020. The testing facility is slated to house a laboratory operated under a partnership with SG Blocks and New Jersey-based Clarity Labs.

The coronavirus tests that are currently available fall into one of two categories: a molecular test, which looks for genetic material from the virus and must be analysed in a lab, and an antigen test, which detects certain proteins in the virus and offers results in minutes. The antigen test can be administered at home like a pregnancy test.

The rate at which the tests fail to detect the virus in a person who actually is infected – known as the false-negative rate – is as low as 2% and as high as 37% for the molecular test, according to a Harvard Medical School blog post. The false-negative rate for the antigen test can be as high as 50%.

Frequently asked questions