X-Ray Machines At Airports: Are They Safe?

Airport security systems use metal detectors, backscatter X-ray machines, millimetre wave scanners, and cabinet X-ray machines to ensure the safety of people travelling. While some security devices use ionising radiation to scan luggage, safety measures are in place to ensure that workers and travellers are not exposed to high levels of radiation. In fact, the amount of radiation received from a backscatter machine is equivalent to the amount of cosmic radiation received during two minutes of flight.

However, concerns have been raised about the potential health risks of X-ray machines, particularly for operators who are exposed to them for longer periods of time.

Ionizing radiation in x-ray machines can knock electrons from atoms, creating free radicals that damage DNA

Ionizing radiation, such as that emitted by X-ray machines, has enough energy to knock electrons away from atoms. This process can create free radicals, which are chemically reactive particles that can cause damage to DNA and increase the risk of cancer.

Ionizing radiation can have a real impact on human health, but only when received in high doses. While X-ray machines used in medical settings emit high doses of radiation, the X-ray machines used in airports emit very low doses. In fact, the dose of radiation from an airport X-ray machine is so low that it is considered inconsequential by experts.

To put it into perspective, a chest X-ray in a medical setting exposes patients to roughly 1,000 times the radiation of an airport scanner. Additionally, the radiation from an airport X-ray machine is equivalent to the radiation exposure of about one minute of flight time. So, the amount of radiation received from an airport X-ray machine is extremely small and not considered harmful.

It is worth noting that there are two types of body scanners used in airports: millimeter-wave scanners and backscatter X-ray scanners. Millimeter-wave scanners use non-ionizing radiation, which does not have enough energy to remove electrons from atoms. Backscatter X-ray scanners, on the other hand, use ionizing radiation, but the doses are still very low.

Overall, while ionizing radiation in X-ray machines can knock electrons from atoms, creating free radicals that damage DNA, the extremely low doses used in airport X-ray machines make them safe for human use.

The dose of radiation makes the poison—everything is toxic if the dose is high enough

While airport X-ray machines emit ionizing radiation, which can be harmful to human health, the dose is very low and therefore not considered dangerous. Ionizing radiation has enough energy to knock electrons away from atoms, creating free radicals that can damage DNA and increase the risk of cancer. However, this only occurs when ionizing radiation is received at high doses.

Airport X-ray machines emit very low doses of radiation—so low that it is unclear whether there is any potential for harm. According to Dr. Lewis Nelson, a professor and chair of emergency medicine, the dose is "inconsequential". To put it into perspective, a chest X-ray exposes patients to about 1,000 times the radiation of an airport scanner. The Health Physics Society estimates that airport X-ray scanners deliver 0.1 microsieverts of radiation per scan, while a typical chest X-ray delivers 100 microsieverts. Furthermore, travellers are exposed to more radiation during the flight itself than from the airport security scanners.

The machines are designed to minimise radiation exposure. For example, the backscatter X-ray scanner, the more common type in the US, utilises very low doses of X-rays, similar to those used in medical imaging. The scanners are also subject to safety regulations and standards to ensure that they do not expose workers and travellers to high levels of radiation.

In summary, while airport X-ray machines emit ionizing radiation, which can be harmful in high doses, the dose emitted by these machines is extremely low and therefore not considered a health risk. The adage "the dose makes the poison—everything is toxic if the dose is high enough" aptly describes the situation.

The amount of radiation in an airport x-ray is tiny compared to a chest x-ray

There are two types of full-body scanners used at airports: those that use millimetre-wave technology and those that use x-ray technology. The former is the type currently used in Canadian airports, and they do not emit x-rays. The latter type, the backscatter x-ray scanner, is more common in the US. These scanners emit very low doses of x-rays, but the amount of radiation in an airport x-ray is tiny compared to a chest x-ray.

The dose of radiation from an airport x-ray scanner is so low that it is unclear whether it could cause any harm. According to Dr. Lewis Nelson, a professor and chair of emergency medicine at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, the amount of radiation delivered by an airport x-ray is "tiny" and "inconsequential" compared to a chest x-ray. A chest x-ray exposes patients to roughly 1,000 times the radiation of an airport scanner. The Health Physics Society estimates that airport x-ray scanners deliver 0.1 microsieverts of radiation per scan, while a typical chest x-ray delivers 100 microsieverts of radiation.

Furthermore, the machines are designed to minimise radiation exposure. For example, the thick walls of cabinet x-ray systems used to screen luggage and carry-on items, as well as the lead curtains at the entry and exit points, keep radiation from escaping. These machines must meet strict standards for radiation leakage and typically have additional safety features such as locks, warning lights, and labels.

In summary, while airport x-ray scanners do emit low levels of radiation, the amount is minuscule compared to other sources of radiation, including a chest x-ray. The risk of any potential harm from these scanners is considered extremely low.

Millimeter-wave scanners emit non-ionizing radiation and are safe for use in airports

There are two types of full-body scanning systems: one uses millimetre-wave technology and the other uses x-ray technology. The former is the primary scanning technology used in the United States and Canada.

Millimetre-wave scanners emit non-ionizing radiation in the form of low-level radio waves. This means that they do not have enough energy to remove electrons from atoms. Instead, they cause atoms in a molecule to vibrate or move around. The waves are projected above and around the passenger's body, with only a small portion being absorbed within a thin layer (1 mm) of the body's surface. The millimetre waves are reflected back to the scanner, creating a 3D image that resembles a fuzzy photo negative.

Millimetre-wave scanners are considered safe for several reasons. Firstly, they emit far less energy than a cell phone. Secondly, they do not use x-rays, which means they do not increase a person's ionizing radiation dose. Thirdly, the electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation used in these scanners does not pose a risk to human health and safety, even with repeated exposures. This has been confirmed by Health Canada, which has assessed the scanners and concluded that they are well within the country's guidelines for safe human exposure. Finally, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has stated that the radiation from millimetre-wave scanners is only a tenth of the radiation limit for the general public.

In conclusion, millimetre-wave scanners emit non-ionizing radiation that is safe for human use in airports. The technology has been designed to minimise health risks and is an important tool for ensuring the safety of air travel.

The US Food and Drug Administration sets standards for radiation-producing machines

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a regulatory, science-based federal agency responsible for protecting and promoting public health through the monitoring and regulation of many products necessary for the health and well-being of consumers. The FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) ensures that all x-ray systems and other radiation-emitting screening equipment are built to use radiation safely. The FDA requires that all machines be correctly calibrated and maintained. Their rules apply to all x-ray equipment at airports as well as medical equipment and other uses of radiation-emitting equipment.

The FDA's jurisdiction includes most food products (other than meat, poultry, and some egg products), animal food, human and animal drugs, medical devices, veterinary devices, therapeutic agents of biologic origin (e.g. vaccines, blood, and blood products) for humans, radiation-emitting products for consumer, medical and occupational use, cosmetics, and tobacco products.

The FDA's role in ensuring the safe use of radiation-emitting products falls under the Electronic Product Radiation Control Program. This program covers any "electronic product" that contains or acts as part of an electronic circuit and emits (or in the absence of effective shielding or other controls would emit) electronic product radiation. The FDA's role in this program is to ensure that manufacturers of radiation-emitting electronic products comply with all applicable requirements.

The FDA's requirements for x-ray machines at airports include that the machines be correctly calibrated and maintained, and that they meet standards for limiting passenger and worker exposure to radiation. The machines must be tested when they are set up and at least once a year to ensure they meet federal, state, and sometimes local safety standards.

In summary, the US Food and Drug Administration plays a crucial role in setting standards for radiation-producing machines, including x-ray machines used at airports, to ensure the safe use of radiation-emitting products and protect public health.

Frequently asked questions