Runways: Concrete Or Asphalt? Exploring Airport Surface Materials

Airport runways are made from either asphalt or concrete. Asphalt is a flexible surface made from a mixture of aggregates such as sand, gravel, and crushed stone, bound together with bitumen. Concrete, on the other hand, is a rigid surface made from a combination of aggregates and a cement-based binding agent. Both asphalt and concrete runways have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between the two depends on various factors such as climate, traffic, and raw material access.

Asphalt runways are more flexible and can accommodate slight ground movements without cracking

Asphalt runways are more flexible than concrete runways and can accommodate slight ground movements without cracking. This flexibility is due to asphalt's composition as a composite material made of aggregates such as sand, gravel, and crushed stone bound together with bitumen, a sticky, black, and highly viscous liquid or semi-solid form of petroleum. This makes asphalt runways ideal for areas with variable temperatures and ground conditions, as they can expand and contract without cracking.

The flexibility of asphalt also provides a smooth surface for aircraft operations, reducing wear and tear on aircraft tires and landing gear. In addition, asphalt runways are easier and quicker to repair compared to concrete. Potholes and surface damage can be patched quickly, minimizing runway downtime.

However, asphalt runways require more frequent maintenance and resurfacing than concrete runways due to wear and degradation over time. They are also heat-sensitive and can soften and become pliable in extreme heat, potentially leading to rutting and surface deformation. In cold weather, asphalt can become brittle and crack, necessitating additional maintenance in colder climates.

Despite these drawbacks, asphalt runways are commonly used in airports due to their initial cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and smooth surface. They are particularly suitable for areas with variable temperatures and ground conditions, as they can accommodate slight ground movements without cracking.

Concrete runways are more durable and can last several decades with minimal maintenance

Concrete runways are a more durable option for airports, capable of lasting several decades with minimal maintenance. Concrete is a composite material made from coarse and fine aggregates, bound together by a cement-based paste. While it takes longer to install and has higher upfront costs, concrete is often more economical in the long run, provided it receives regular upkeep.

Concrete runways are categorised as rigid pavement and are constructed by placing slabs of portland cement on a prepared sub-base. When an aircraft lands, the slabs bend slightly, transferring the load to the materials underneath. Concrete's strength and durability make it ideal for large airports with frequent operations of heavy aircraft.

Although concrete runways require less frequent maintenance than asphalt, they are more prone to cracking, especially in freeze-thaw conditions. Repairs can be challenging and costly, and if major work is needed, the entire runway may need to be closed for weeks or months.

When choosing a runway surface, airport architects consider various factors, including climate, traffic, and access to raw materials. For airports seeking long-term durability and minimal maintenance, concrete is often the preferred option, despite the higher initial costs and longer installation times.

Asphalt runways are quicker and easier to repair than concrete runways

For example, an airport user on Reddit shared that they are transforming their concrete runway to asphalt over a few years. They cannot afford to close the runway for an extended period, but the concrete runway, built in the 1970s, requires major repairs. So, they are closing the runway nightly during the summers to tear out the concrete and replace it with asphalt. While the asphalt runway will require more frequent maintenance, they will be able to keep it in better health than the concrete runway, which was rated "poor" by FAA standards.

Another example is Frankfurt Airport, which previously had concrete runways but has since switched to asphalt. This allows for quicker repairs and reduces the amount of time the runway is out of operation.

The choice between asphalt and concrete runways depends on various factors, including durability, maintenance, climate, traffic, and raw material access. Asphalt runways offer the advantage of quicker and easier repairs, making them a viable option for airports that need to balance runway upkeep with operational demands.

Concrete runways are more expensive and time-consuming to install and repair than asphalt runways

Asphalt is a liquid or semi-solid type of petroleum made from aggregate materials held together with a binder. It creates a flexible runway pavement made of several layers resting on a base of granular material. The base course is the most important section as it protects other layers from stress and strain during use, preventing cracks.

Concrete, on the other hand, is a combination of aggregates and binding agents. It takes longer to install and is more expensive upfront. Concrete runways also require careful protection during installation. For example, the points where crews enter and exit are at a higher risk of mud or road-salting materials getting ground into the concrete.

Concrete runways are more prone to cracking, which increases the frequency and cost of repairs. When concrete slabs crack, the entire runway may need to be closed for weeks or months. In contrast, asphalt runways can be repaired more quickly and easily.

The choice between concrete and asphalt runways depends on various factors, including climate, traffic, budget, maintenance, and raw material access.

Climate, traffic and raw material access are important factors when choosing between asphalt and concrete runways

When deciding between asphalt and concrete runways, there are several factors to consider, including climate, traffic, and raw material access.

Asphalt is a flexible surface, while concrete is classified as a rigid surface. Asphalt is made from aggregate materials held together with a binder, creating a flexible runway with a layered structure that distributes the weight of aircraft. Concrete, on the other hand, is made from cement-based binders and slabs that bend slightly to distribute the load.

Climate plays a crucial role in the selection of runway materials. Asphalt is susceptible to fuel degradation and can be affected by airplane fuel and hydraulic fluids, which can cause premature cracking. Concrete, however, is susceptible to cracking when exposed to extreme high and low temperatures. Therefore, the choice between asphalt and concrete depends on the local climate conditions.

Traffic and usage patterns also influence the choice of runway material. Concrete handles stationary loads well, making it suitable for parking spots and holding areas. On the other hand, asphalt is more flexible and gentle on aircraft tires during touchdown, making it a preferred choice for runways with high traffic.

Additionally, the availability of raw materials and maintenance considerations come into play. Concrete is generally more expensive to install and repair than asphalt. Asphalt may be preferred when long-term budgets are uncertain or when quick repairs are needed, as it can be laid over a worn concrete base. However, concrete is often more economical over time if it receives proper maintenance.

In summary, the decision between asphalt and concrete runways depends on various factors, including climate conditions, traffic patterns, raw material availability, maintenance considerations, and budget constraints. Both materials have their advantages and are chosen based on the specific requirements and characteristics of each airport.

Frequently asked questions